ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2000 Winter Slush Series-revised

To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: 2000 Winter Slush Series-revised
From: "Jesse Wills" <jesse@wordex.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2000 14:10:07 -0700
I think one thing we need to watch is people speeding around in the outer
parking area.

2 weeks ago, a black Audi sped through the check in gate ahead of me and the
worker shook her head and asked me if he was with our group.  Yesterday, I
saw several cars speeding up and out of the site.  I think most of these are
non-autoxers, but one actually still had his paper number in the window
(Blue Civic Si #298).

I was talking with some people about having a worker position at the top of
the hill to keep people off of the lower area, is this feasible?

Jesse

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vernon Head" <vhead@fuelrtm.com>
To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: 2000 Winter Slush Series-revised


> I think GGF is a good site for many reasons. It's fairly large with few
solid objects or bad bumps to work around. The surface seems durable and has
more grip than Oakland. It's not too far to drive, nor is it too hot. And it
seems fairly safe from theft.
>
> -Vernon
>
> On Monday, August 28, 2000, John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com> wrote:
> >You don't HAVE to run GGF if you don't want to. Yesterday the Sacramento
> >Chapter had an event at Mather Field. And NASA had an event at Marina,
too.
> >Thank you for attending a San Francisco Region event.
> >
> >That's all we can get. You could do us a big favor if you landed a site
> >near San Jose.
> >Moffett Field has already said "no." And so has Great America. The Santa
> >Clara Co. Fairgrounds has this gravel lot which is, uh, not suitable. You
> >positive thoughts in the future will be appreciated
> >
> >GGF is presently a superior surface to 3 Com and/or the Oakland Coliseum.
> >And it's bigger than Stockton. Without GGF in our possibilities we will
be
> >running considerably beyond our local neighborhood. It is the BEST we can
> >do at this time. It combines
> >        1) a reasonable, but aging, surface;
> >        2) outstanding location central in the Bay Area;
> >        3) reasonable rental fees;
> >        4) a management that's easy to work with.
> >
> >--John Kelly
> >
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>