ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: 2000 Winter Slush Series-revised

To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: 2000 Winter Slush Series-revised
From: Vernon Head <vhead@fuelrtm.com>
Date: 28 Aug 2000 13:40:11 -0700
I think GGF is a good site for many reasons. It's fairly large with few solid 
objects or bad bumps to work around. The surface seems durable and has more 
grip than Oakland. It's not too far to drive, nor is it too hot. And it seems 
fairly safe from theft.

-Vernon

On Monday, August 28, 2000, John Kelly <76067.1750@compuserve.com> wrote:
>You don't HAVE to run GGF if you don't want to. Yesterday the Sacramento
>Chapter had an event at Mather Field. And NASA had an event at Marina, too.
>Thank you for attending a San Francisco Region event. 
>
>That's all we can get. You could do us a big favor if you landed a site
>near San Jose.
>Moffett Field has already said "no." And so has Great America. The Santa
>Clara Co. Fairgrounds has this gravel lot which is, uh, not suitable. You
>positive thoughts in the future will be appreciated
>
>GGF is presently a superior surface to 3 Com and/or the Oakland Coliseum.
>And it's bigger than Stockton. Without GGF in our possibilities we will be
>running considerably beyond our local neighborhood. It is the BEST we can
>do at this time. It combines 
>        1) a reasonable, but aging, surface; 
>        2) outstanding location central in the Bay Area;
>        3) reasonable rental fees;
>        4) a management that's easy to work with.
>
>--John Kelly
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>