Let me second that Mr. Mike.
Andy D.
On 08/03/98 04:47 PM \Mr. Mike\" Passaretti" said...
>
>
>>>>>> "William" == William Davies <w.davies@virgin.net> writes:
>
> William> If BMH had seen a better return
> William> on their investment in the TR6 shell, I suspect
> William> we would have seen more Triumph shells
> William> remanufactured. Perhaps a Spitfire shell would
> William> have been a better choice as their first Triumph
> William> shell? Not a flame, just a little information
> William> not greatly publicised in Triumph circles, Best
> William> regards, Bill.
>
>I, for one, would love to see the TR4/4A shell redone, but I'm
>not holding my breath. I think the real reason is that MGBs
>were made for years and remained roughly the same from
>60's(?)-80's but the TR went through 3 bodies in that time. (4-8)
>It's a volume thing.
> -MM
|