triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Spitfire radiator hose again

To: Andrew Mace <amace@unix2.nysed.gov>
Subject: Re: Spitfire radiator hose again
From: Joe Curry <curry@wolfenet.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 1997 09:35:19 -0800
Cc: Brian Harper <brian@ati.com>, Zink <zink@pdq.net>, "Atwell (Buff) Haines" <carbuff@scooter.net>, triumphs@Autox.Team.Net
Organization: Curry Enterprises
References: <Pine.PCW.3.94.971118122158.11679A-100000@Andrew-Mace>
Andrew Mace wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 18 Nov 1997, Brian Harper wrote:
> 
> > I'm new to Spitfires, but it appears that there is some difference between
> > the 1500 motor/motormounts and the earlier motor or motormounts, and the
> > 1500 version rubs or almost rubs the hose. Because you have an earlier car
> > perhaps you can't even see why this would be a problem. On my car the lower
> > radiator outlet points right at the motormount, and is just a few inches 
>away.
> 
> There's no difference that I know of between "early" and "late" Spitfires
> in either the engine mount itself or the basic layout of the engine
> block/mounting plate and related components. What might account for some
> of the clearance problems in later Spitfires is the use of the narrower
> radiator on the later cars (late 1500s are still another story) as opposed
> to the "full-width" radiator used up to and perhaps including some Mk.3
> Spitfires.
> 
> Just a guess.
> 
Andy,
That is also my best guess, since there is obvious differneces in the
radiators and I used the old Radiator and the 1500 engine, my assumption
is that the Rad. is the reason.

Joe


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>