bricklin
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: bricklin mailing list dead?

To: bricklin mailing list <Bricklin@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: bricklin mailing list dead?
From: illyana delorean <illyanadmc@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 1999 00:47:53 -0800 (PST)
>which car is more superior the Bricklin >or the Delorean?

i don't think either is superior, they are both great cars in
different ways!

>Which is a safer car?

although i know nothing about how safe a delorean is, i would think
that a bricklin would be safer. i mean, it was made to be a safe car,
right? except i would think it would be easier to get stuck in a
bricklin, because the doors are power doors and delorean doors aren't.
except then i guess it would be easier to climb out the brick's
window, because it is fully-functional, unlike the D's "toolbooth
windows." ;>

>Which one gets more looks?

obviously the delorean is more well-known because of BTTF and john
delorean being arrested and such, but i would think that, unless some
idiot mistook it for a corvette or z-car, the bricklin would get more
looks. the delorean is ugly in a way, and the brick is sleeker, more
powerful-looking. i don't own either cars, but i have seen both while
driving, and i make more noise when i see a bricklin because it is
rarer.

>Which one would you rather own if given a choice.

personally, i would get a Delorean. but it would have to be a
twin-turbo 5speed, because automatic deloreans aren't that powerful. i
love bricks and all, but i have wanted a delorean since i was a kid
and i think they are nicer interior-wise and they look like lotus
esprits - i love those cars!

>What would you change on a Bricklin if you were given a chance,make
it with normal doors,convertable ect.

probably give it a nicer interior look (btw, i have only had one
chance to look at the interior of a brick up-close, so i am going only
by an old memory). i don't know much about bricks, so i can't really
say much. 

also, if *anyone* says they would give the brick non-gullwing doors, i
will be very mad!


<-illyana->



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>