Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*COOLING\s+SYSTEM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*COOLING\s+SYSTEM\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. Fw: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 02:00:27 -0400; == Agreed. == Such is the case with heat transfer. == I'll have to take your word for it, since I couldn't find anything in a quick search to either confirm or refute it. == To help understand this; /html/bricklin/1999-09/msg00006.html (12,788 bytes)
2. Fw: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 02:21:29 -0400; == I was tired, preoccupied, and rather poorly stated the point I was trying to make. In the case of F1, Indycars, and some sports prototypes, the shrouded radiators 'hot soak' from the surrounding; /html/bricklin/1999-09/msg00009.html (11,267 bytes)
3. Re: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Mike and Candy Joehrendt" <Joehrend@bellsouth.net>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 06:14:25 -0400; Wrong. Increasing RPM (to 2000 or so) increases both airflow and coolant flow and the engine cools down. If you do not believe thermodynamic theory as taught in physics classes around the world and; /html/bricklin/1999-09/msg00011.html (8,025 bytes)
4. Fw: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 12:51:08 -0400; Air flow increases, but until the fan clutch is engaged, it's increase in cooling effect appears to be marginal with rising RPM. Once engaged, it still doesn't seem to help much, if any at rest. To u; /html/bricklin/1999-09/msg00012.html (9,175 bytes)
5. RE: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Somerville, Drew" <Somerville@kafb.aero.org>; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 13:17:00 -0700; The physics and engineering are clear and indisputable with respect to heat transfer rate versus coolant mass flow rate, whether we are talking about engine coolant (water/ethylene glycol) or radiato; /html/bricklin/1999-09/msg00013.html (13,682 bytes)
6. RE: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "K M" <symbiotic@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 08 Sep 1999 14:26:38 PDT; Drew, your comments remind me of the story about the college physics teacher who asked her students how they could determine the height of a building using a barometer. One said that he would take a; /html/bricklin/1999-09/msg00014.html (8,452 bytes)
7. Re: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: Lbc302@aol.com; Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 20:19:52 EDT; << There are only two ways to resolve Gregs conundrum. The first would be to All I know is last time I drove Vin#1024,it was without a thermostat,and it has never run cooler(below 210degrees)It had A; /html/bricklin/1999-09/msg00016.html (7,280 bytes)
8. Cooling system (score: 1): Author: Jonathan Garruba <jgarru01@kepler.poly.edu>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:40:22 -0400 (EDT); I'm having problems keeping the engine cool. it runs hot all the time(220 degrees) So I checked the therostat, and found out that there was none. So heres the question. Is this common? was it just de; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00041.html (7,439 bytes)
9. Fw: Cooling system (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:00:41 -0400; It needs a thermostat. I recommend a 160deg for all but winter driving. When you run without a thermostat, the water moves too quickly through the radiator for much heat transfer to take place. With; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00042.html (8,310 bytes)
10. Re: Cooling system (score: 1): Author: "Mike and Candy Joehrendt" <Joehrend@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:36:03 -0400; This is not my experience. From new, my car would run 210 to 240. Bricklins have a reputation for running hot. They will overheat when stuck in traffic on the interstate in summer. I removed my therm; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00043.html (9,154 bytes)
11. COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "George J. Malaska" <bricklingeorge@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:30:31 -0400; Gregg was right, you should have a thermostat in the engine. It can not cool properly if the coolant is not slowed down enough to have the heat dissipated in the radiator. Also, 210 degrees is not pu; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00049.html (10,149 bytes)
12. Fw: Cooling system (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 22:42:50 -0400; What can I say? This is from personal experience with my '75 that I bought new. I live in Ga, and have traveled extensively throughout the S.E., including all the way to Miami in late July / early Au; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00050.html (12,021 bytes)
13. cooling system (score: 1): Author: Jim Kelliher <ginjim@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 22:56:12 -0400; A thermostat is needed for your engine & emissions systems, to operate There are other areas to check that have not been mentioned. What front air dam are you using? Has your radiator ever been flush; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00051.html (8,130 bytes)
14. Re: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: Lbc302@aol.com; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 22:57:01 EDT; << Gregg was right, you should have a thermostat in the engine. It can not cool properly if the coolant is not slowed down enough to have the heat dissipated in the radiator. Also, 210 degrees is not; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00066.html (9,341 bytes)
15. Fw: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 13:11:56 -0400; This is strictly an opinion since it's contrary to the conventional wisdom which is based on ~100yrs of research and / or experience WRT the automobile. == SNIP, SNIP, and more SNIP My last post add; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00070.html (8,709 bytes)
16. RE: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Somerville, Drew" <Somerville@kafb.aero.org>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 06:57:00 -0700; Please let me clarify an apparently common misunderstanding regarding heat transfer. The statement being made that the rate of heat transfer is higher if the fluid flow is slower is incorrect and exc; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00071.html (12,073 bytes)
17. RE: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: Jeff Wood <Cybertec@TheGrid.Net>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:34:26 -0700; Well, all I can say is that when I yanked the thremostat out of my '71 mustang, 302CID and huge radiator it ran hotter. Pump and rad. and fan all working fine. My Triumph Spitfire was worse, but it w; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00073.html (12,459 bytes)
18. Fw: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 16:33:11 -0400; This is a pretty big misunderstanding! AFAIK, heat transfer is primarily a function of temperature differential and a material's ability to dissipate or absorb it. Using t'stat open Vs closed as proo; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00085.html (10,880 bytes)
19. Re: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Mike and Candy Joehrendt" <Joehrend@bellsouth.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 19:31:59 -0400; in And you lose that wager! As the water gets to the end of the copper pipe (radiator), it is cool and thus not transferring much heat to the air. With the rapidly flowing water, you must catch it,; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00086.html (9,412 bytes)
20. Fw: COOLING SYSTEM (score: 1): Author: "Greg Monfort" <wingracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 22:01:59 -0400; == It transferred the heat to the air and the hand, in this case. That's the point isn't it? To transfer as much heat as reasonable away from the coolant, so that it can wick some more away from the; /html/bricklin/1999-08/msg00089.html (10,828 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]