Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C\s+Stock\s+in\s+2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*C\s+Stock\s+in\s+2000\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Phil Esra <pesra@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 10:58:21 -0800 (PST); Hmm. Thanks to all for the excellent Miata information. If I could backtrack a step: Between the 1.6 Miata and the '91-92 MR2, which might be easier to drive at its limit? I would suspect that the he; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00165.html (7,873 bytes)
2. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: JAKramer@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 14:24:45 EST; I have a '91 MR2 and a 2nd gen RX-7. The RX-7 isn't exactly the Miata, but it does represent a well balanced front engine, rear wheel drive setup. In my personal experience - the RX-7 is definitely e; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00167.html (8,673 bytes)
3. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Bret Dodson <bret@serv.net>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:52:01 -0800 (PST); The 1.6 Miata would get my nod for being easier to drive at its limits. Though, IMO, I don't think it has a chance of keeping up with the MR2 on most courses. Miatas have a shortwheel base and rotat; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00170.html (9,569 bytes)
4. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <joe_goeke@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 13:29:58 PST; I've driven both. I'd pick the MR2. on final regional quite of us announcers loved that the be proves be on nature; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00174.html (10,468 bytes)
5. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <joe_goeke@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 14:11:56 PST; I've driven both. I'd pick the MR2. on final regional quite of us announcers loved that the be proves be on nature; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00176.html (10,646 bytes)
6. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <joe_goeke@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 14:14:51 PST; I've driven both. I'd pick the MR2. on final regional quite of us announcers loved that the be proves be on nature; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00177.html (10,750 bytes)
7. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 13:49:51 -0800; So...what your saying is you would go with the MR2? 8) I have also driven both. I kicked my own MR2 Butt in a 1.6 Miata. 8) I think the MR2 rewards a good driver more and that the Miata can be more f; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00182.html (8,152 bytes)
8. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 22:57:07 EST; << I think it would be easier for a new driver to drive the Miata nearer the limit. Want to see a spin-fest? Watch a bunch of newbie MR2 autocrossers. 8-) >> Hey, do I resemble that remark??? CHD; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00189.html (8,224 bytes)
9. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 22:57:05 EST; << Between the 1.6 Miata and the '91-92 MR2, which might be easier to drive at its limit? I would suspect that the heavier, mid-engine design might be trickier in transitions? >> I'm betting on the M; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00192.html (8,503 bytes)
10. re: C stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Dave Hillman <hillman@enteract.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 11:14:56 -0600 (CST); Randy Chase wrote... Well it took me 4 events in our MR2 before I spun it, but then I did it 3 times, and once more the next event. OTOH, I spun the 1.8 Miata I borrowed the first day, but only once.; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00206.html (8,764 bytes)
11. Re: C stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 07:40:40 -0800; I think a lot of the MR-2/Miata question (beyond driver) is the car set up. A stock aligned MR2 can be brutal if your aggressive. Back when I started in this sport, for the first few years, I heard t; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00207.html (8,781 bytes)
12. RE: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 10:15:08 -0800; I got to drive Andy McKee's MR-2 once or twice, I can't remember, but what I noticed was that the faster I drove it, the better it handled. The thing is, you've got this big ol' hunkin' weight in the; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00214.html (9,788 bytes)
13. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Phil Esra <pesra@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 10:27:14 -0800 (PST); Oy, so much to learn... careful, or I'll slap a big .sig file on and really go to town :) then you Hey, like they say, car sluts can't be choosers. How do I know you just couldn't find some poor sap; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00215.html (8,445 bytes)
14. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 08:44:15 -0800; I also find that there is a big difference in cars when you find out your in a sweeper and you are going to fast. My experience in a 1.6l miata was to turn the wheel more and the car just turned more; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00218.html (8,904 bytes)
15. RE: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Kevin McCormick <ktm@Unify.Com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 10:40:43 -0800; Hi Phil and all, Back when Jesse Wills had a '92 or '93 Miata, I co-drove with him at an event. Compared to my '95 R, it felt much lighter and more nimble. Less skittish? Not really - Jesse had it se; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00221.html (9,520 bytes)
16. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>; Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 08:52:53 -0800; I think this is it. Some cars are much better set up than others. Now, Andy and Theresa brought their car down to San Diego for our last event (*they* did very well...Kevin) 8-). I drove Andy's car.; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00222.html (8,884 bytes)
17. RE: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Kelly, Katie" <kkelly@spss.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 10:53:46 -0800; Oh my gosh, I totally forgot. I drove Jesse Wills 1.6 Miata at a ProSolo a couple of years ago, and it is, by far, the FUNNEST Miata I've ever driven. How could I forget? In fact, if I didn't have Lu; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00225.html (8,105 bytes)
18. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 13:14:19 -0800 (PST); Well, for another datapoint, my '96 1.8 "M" (aka "you really race that thing?") is plenty skittish, and probably mushier than the 1.6. Soft springs, soft Tokicos, soft swaybar, driver a bit soft in t; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00230.html (8,034 bytes)
19. RE: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 13:21:53 -0800 (PST); Just out of curiosity, has anyone autoxed the '92 or '93 Miata LE (the ones with the 14x6 BBS wheels)? Anything good/bad about them vs. the cooking 1.6's? Craig Blome; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00234.html (7,383 bytes)
20. Re: C Stock in 2000 (score: 1): Author: "Joe Goeke" <joe_goeke@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 15:25:30 -0800; For me it's between 'George' and Renee's Miata for best handling cars. I tried to copy Renee's setup first, and then after driving George in Seattle, I tried to copy him as well. Never seemed do get; /html/autox/1999-02/msg00254.html (10,274 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]