autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: C Stock in 2000

To: bret@serv.net, autox@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: C Stock in 2000
From: "Joe Goeke" <joe_goeke@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1999 14:11:56 PST
I've driven both.  I'd pick the MR2.

>Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 11:52:01 -0800 (PST)
>From: Bret Dodson <bret@serv.net>
>To: "team.net" <autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: C Stock in 2000
>Reply-To: Bret Dodson <bret@serv.net>
>
>> In a message dated 2/4/1999, 12:59:57 PM, pesra@yahoo.com writes:
>> <<Between the 1.6 Miata and the '91-92 MR2, which might be easier to
>> drive at its limit?>>
>
>The 1.6 Miata would get my nod for being easier to drive at its limits. 
>Though, IMO, I don't think it has a chance of keeping up with the MR2 
on
>most courses.
>
>Miatas have a shortwheel base and rotate quickly.  They are indeed very
>well balanced cars but are quite capable of giving rear-weight biased
>cars a spin for their money ;^)  Or maybe it's just me.
>
>JAKramer wrote: 
>> I participated in a 24 hour autox last year with my MR2 that was the 
final
>> event of the NC championship series.  There were a number of good 
regional
>> drivers including lot's of MR2s and lots of Miatas.  The MR2 gang was 
quite
>> entertaining to say the least.  Each of us spun at least once, some 
of us
>> (yours truly included) multiple times  - the spectators and 
announcers loved
>> us :)    In contrast, not one Miata spun!  I suppose one could argue 
that the
>> Miata drivers were more experienced than the MR2 crew, but that would 
be
>> statistically improbable with the numbers in both camps.  I think it 
proves
>> the MR2 is harder to handle when driven at the limit.
>
>24 hour autox?  Do tell. 
>
>I've often thought it'd be fun to have a nighttime autox.  Ideally I'd 
be
>able to convince a herd of the rare breed of reflective cones to settle 
on
>our site for a night.  Unless someone has identified a breed of
>glow-in-the-dark cones (conus luminus?)
>
>> <<Another consideration might be the added low-rpm pull of the MR2's
>> truckier engine? Seems like the added oomph coming off a corner might
>> better cover up driver errors?>>
>
>Yep.  Many was the time when I would lament the "torque challenged" 
nature
>of my 1.6 Miata.  This was usually after I'd over-cooked an element and
>slid sideways losing all of my momentum, thinking it best to practice
>"speed maintenance" and carry as much speed as possible all the time.
>
>Fortunatley Miatae are short and easily fit sideways through gates,
>
>Bret Dodson
>'96 Miata R  B Stock Pax
>Seattle, WA
>Wanna see a Miata spin? Just add water.
>
>



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>