Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Street\s+Mod\s+exclusions\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Don Kline" <solo2dmmr2@hotmail.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2000 04:29:38
Boy did I miss the boat with my DMOD MR2. If I'd have waited a few years I could have taken an old Pinto, put in an SHO engine, or a Probe engine, either probably being lighter than the original, pla
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00116.html (9,010 bytes)

22. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 08:08:20 -0600
<quoting me> and I was pointing out the incredible discrepancy between the "stated intent" of the class and its extremely liberal prep allowances. Some (one, at least) of the promoters of SM drive th
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00123.html (9,250 bytes)

23. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 10:01:27 -0500
I think most of the current SM cars are very much street cars. I drive mine on weekends and drive to local events. It still has AC, cruise, CD player and power seats. I couldn't drive a stock Neon to
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00124.html (9,350 bytes)

24. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "kent rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 14:20:50 -0500
"Begin figuring out," Jay? In broad terms, SM is a "street car" class where (almost) anything goes. Turbos, superchargers, engine swaps, differential and tranny swaps, brake upgrades - where does one
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00127.html (8,929 bytes)

25. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 13:43:23 -0600
It's good to see you're including the quotes in the above. They're quite appropriate. SM more open than Prepared in many ways, but with interiors. Yep. And BOVs, and whatever. So far, the SM rules do
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00128.html (9,323 bytes)

26. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 16:17:45 -0500
That sounds like a recipe to allow Porsches. :^) A lot of 944s on the street, too. :^) Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00129.html (8,540 bytes)

27. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 16:19:45 -0500
I bet if we sit down and look at a lot of these cars (Porsches included) I bet we could find good classes were they might fit in the current structure. Hey, Rog, wanna come back to classing things? :
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00130.html (9,945 bytes)

28. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 18:22:35 -0500
Sorta like Street Prepared is now......... So, licensing has no meaning in SP, just it doesn't in SM.... Seeing how SM inherited it rule base from SP, that just doesn't seem that bad. So what if the
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00134.html (8,821 bytes)

29. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "msmith2" <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 18:40:00 -0500
And lights, and wipers, and heaters, and tread, and stereos, and.... Why not? The chink in the armor of any SM car will be tires, pure and simple. Again, so what? Is there something inherently wrong
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00135.html (9,378 bytes)

30. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 18:16:49 -0600
It's not _required_ in SP. It is also not required in Stock. Requiring it in SM is silly. SM goes a lot further than SP in suspension, engine, and gearbox allowances. Why require that in SM, but not
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00138.html (8,556 bytes)

31. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:51:36 EST
Jay Mitchell responded: I think requiring it in SM takes the place of a lot of other S and SP rules. If a car conforms to the Stock rules, it is by definition, licensable. In SM, the actual license i
/html/autox/2000-12/msg00142.html (7,638 bytes)

32. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:59:11 -0500
Who said anything about building? http://www.968.net/racing/bruces_turbo_rs.htm Think this would pass muster? :^) It resides in Massachusetts. Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net For the ultimate Rally b
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00555.html (8,539 bytes)

33. RE: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Joffe" <spdrcr5@bigfoot.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:07:37 -0500
That car is not legal for the class! The class requires that only the rear seats are allowed to be removed! I am not even sure about the drivers seat being non-stock. I forgot what the rules state o
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00556.html (9,337 bytes)

34. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:11:38 -0500
Okay, so then maybe a mod class? :^) Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net For the ultimate Rally book and information, go to http://www.goss.com/rally.htm and type in "MU01" for a ten percent discount. re
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00557.html (10,721 bytes)

35. RE: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Joffe" <spdrcr5@bigfoot.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:12:17 -0500
One other thing, it is a German car and that too makes it ineligible! Larry Joffe SM #27/127 2000 Audi TT Quattro spdrcr5@bigfoot.com ______ ______ /_ __//_ __/ / / / / /_/ /_/
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00559.html (10,434 bytes)

36. Re: Street Mod exclusions (score: 1)
Author: "Matt Murray" <mattm@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2000 17:21:47 -0500
Now you are on the right track! Just like the Porsche Club of America's *Hospitality Tent* is the Protest Hanger. :^) So which mod or prepared class does it run? :^) Matt Murray mattm@optonline.net
/html/autox/2000-11/msg00560.html (8,075 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 36
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu