| To: | autox@autox.team.net | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Street Mod exclusions | 
| From: | Smokerbros@aol.com | 
| Date: | Sun, 3 Dec 2000 20:51:36 EST | 
| Mike Smith wrote: >So, licensing has no meaning in SP, just it doesn't in SM.... Jay Mitchell responded: > It's not _required_ in SP. It is also not required in Stock. > Requiring it in SM is silly. > I think requiring it in SM takes the place of a lot of other S and SP rules. If a car conforms to the Stock rules, it is by definition, licensable. In SM, the actual license is needed. Charlie Davis | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Street Mod exclusions, et.al., Mark J. Andy | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SM exclusions, Eric Moon | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Street Mod exclusions, Jay Mitchell | 
| Next by Thread: | PCA and SCCA (Who hates whom), jwalter | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |