Mail Archive Search: <+from:rjohnson@friendlynet.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:rjohnson@friendlynet.com: 148 ]

Total 148 documents matching your query.

81. Re: NO Spec Tires Please (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:19:14 -0400; Thank you I think. I will clearly say that in the early days with BFG, as they were trying to put a dent in the Yokohama dominance, there were some games played, and the Y. guys played them right bac; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01115.html (8,825 bytes)
82. Re: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 10:35:07 -0400; Geez - mistaken for Hoelscher? What an insult! (insert smiley face here), Roger 2 said and; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01135.html (10,012 bytes)
83. Re: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 23:10:13 -0500; -I don't happen to agree with Steve H. regarding ECU's. -Fuel can be tested. -There are FAR bigger gains to be had by designing a tire to beat the '140' rule, than by fudging the DOT rule. Look at it; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01154.html (11,117 bytes)
84. Re: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:11:50 -0500; Spec tires at Nationals. Ugly for a few, but best for the masses. Gives the marketing guy something to sell. Or leave STS a Regional class. . . . . . <gggg>. R2 that Ecsta of; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01171.html (9,548 bytes)
85. Re: Mower racing vs ProSolo (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 10:13:53 -0500; 20% is the last number I recall. . . . R2 hard obviously; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01173.html (10,784 bytes)
86. Fw: STS Tire Rules (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:04:40 -0500; Or another idea rears it's ugly head: Spec Vendor? All competitors MUST buy tires from, say, Tire Rack? (Just selecting one at random <;-) Perhaps we could convince Matt & Co. to 'brand' the tires,; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01194.html (8,259 bytes)
87. Re: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 20:33:24 -0500; What the hell - Given the decreased traffic, I might as well head straight for the "Top 10 Posters List". . . . . I have competed in Solo II for 22 years. I served on the Stock classing sub-committee; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01211.html (9,622 bytes)
88. Re: Letter to SEB / ESP (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 00:01:55 -0500; Safe to assume that this "large community" will make up for the existing denizens of ESP we have & will continue to lose? The community is really as large as the F-car & Mustang contingent? Altho' th; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01229.html (8,740 bytes)
89. Re: STS Tires - best way!!! (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:16:10 -0500; Brian, I can absolutely, positively assure you that for STS to be a National class, an inclusion list will NOT work. I have seen manufacturers cheat in ways that you cannot comprehend. And contrary t; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01283.html (11,141 bytes)
90. Marque Clubs (score: 1): Author: "Roger Johnson" <rjohnson@friendlynet.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 19:32:37 -0500; Paul & Brian have reflected on BMW and Porsche Club members views of SCCA Solo II classing and allowances. I can assure you that NCCC (Corvette) club members have the same views. We have often heard; /html/autox/2000-10/msg01286.html (7,816 bytes)
91. White lines are FLOUR!!! (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 10:39:52 -0500; What class WOULD the car be competitive in? Inquiring minds et.al. Roger; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00688.html (7,223 bytes)
92. PC Topeka Thanks! (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 11:07:44 -0500; I wanted to say thanks to an incredible group of folks for their efforts in Topeka - the crew that volunteered to be the subject of derision & abuse for months after the event - the entrants who chos; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00691.html (7,708 bytes)
93. RE: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 12:25:18 -0500; Me too - already too many classes. 20 entrants at an event with almost 1100 competitors isn't enough for a new class to be considered, or for an old class to be retained. Roger; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01000.html (8,656 bytes)
94. Re: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 15:28:06 -0500; Sorry - small codicil. What I meant to say: Per the SII rules, open class entrants + ladies class entrants = combined numbers being the criteria for inclusion as a National Class. (4.7, page 61) That; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01020.html (10,196 bytes)
95. Re: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:03:16 -0500; Clearly, we are talking about degrees in this stuff: Perhaps all would agree that 1 entrant in a class at the National Championship, on a consistent basis, is too few entries to warrant a class. 150; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01030.html (12,082 bytes)
96. RE: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:07:02 -0500; Yep - parallel Ladies Classes have Champions, too. You sexist. <ggggg> Roger; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01031.html (8,543 bytes)
97. Re: BSM/SM2 (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2000 17:59:08 -0500; This is exactly my point - we are all talking degrees here. You are comfortable with 62 classes, I thought that 50 was too many when we were at that level. Someone else could make 70 their target, or; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01035.html (15,062 bytes)
98. # of classes and particitpation (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2000 13:35:28 -0500; You know, Jeff has made me see the light. If we have enough (O+L) 12 car classes, we can all be champions. So let's begin the list for the new national classes we will create: -SM 2 & 3 -Legends -Mia; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01074.html (11,162 bytes)
99. Enough already with the attacks (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 19:31:58 -0500; I will happily address this issue in public! You say: "Debate, educated discourse and discussion, not name calling please." If this is an example of debate, educated discourse & discussion, then I am; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01160.html (8,970 bytes)
100. Things to Never Do (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 20:12:52 -0500; Now, I've certainly got an opinion on everything - but even my sub-202 IQ brain tells me to never offer one on Ladies Classes. In all of my time on the 'net, every time this subject comes up, it is G; /html/autox/2000-09/msg01286.html (7,402 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]