:-)
sbw
-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
To: Scotty *BOB* White <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Cc: Kent Rafferty <gs96@sgi.net>; autocross list <autox@autox.team.net>
Date: Friday, April 02, 1999 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: SP Proposal
>> >Do you mean that marques that do the sport best are not allowed to
compete?
>> >Where do you "bump" them? Doesn't make sense to me.
>>
>> I think you mean, *de best AT the sport* don't you? ;-) As for doing
the
>> sport good? Well...
>
> Watcha tryin to do, start an argument or somepen?--Pat K
>
>>
>>
>> sbw
>>
>> >Kent Rafferty wrote:
>> >
>> >> After reading the new SPAC proposal, I'm still befuddled by some
>> >> of the classifications. For example, the M3 moves DOWN to Group
>> >> 6 from CSP while many seemingly slower cars can be found in
>> >> Groups I, II, and III. How about a NON-TURBO Stealth in Group II --
>> >> any takers?
>> >>
>> >> OK, my kneejerk suggestion, which does not create another SP
>> >> class and may make for more interesting competition: Bump the
>> >> RX-7 TT and Lotus Elan OUT of SP and combine A/SP and B/SP
>> >> and move all the "dregs" down to C, D and E where they'll still
>> >> get smoked - just not as badly. To teach me a lesson, you can
>> >> even throw my car into the new A/SP-B/SP class.........
>> >>
>> >> BTW, I love Elans and RX-7 TTs, but by removing them a whole host
>> >> of cars are at proximate parity: 911s, Corvettes, 240Zs, Vipers, etc.
>> >> To add one more element, let the turbo cars run unlimited boost
w/stock
>> >> turbos in this class then see if the 300ZXTTs, Supra TTs, Porsche
turbos,
>> >> etc. can compete.
>> >>
>> >> Kent Rafferty
>> >> E/SP Supra TT
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>
>
>
>
|