> >Do you mean that marques that do the sport best are not allowed to compete?
> >Where do you "bump" them? Doesn't make sense to me.
>
> I think you mean, *de best AT the sport* don't you? ;-) As for doing the
> sport good? Well...
Watcha tryin to do, start an argument or somepen?--Pat K
>
>
> sbw
>
> >Kent Rafferty wrote:
> >
> >> After reading the new SPAC proposal, I'm still befuddled by some
> >> of the classifications. For example, the M3 moves DOWN to Group
> >> 6 from CSP while many seemingly slower cars can be found in
> >> Groups I, II, and III. How about a NON-TURBO Stealth in Group II --
> >> any takers?
> >>
> >> OK, my kneejerk suggestion, which does not create another SP
> >> class and may make for more interesting competition: Bump the
> >> RX-7 TT and Lotus Elan OUT of SP and combine A/SP and B/SP
> >> and move all the "dregs" down to C, D and E where they'll still
> >> get smoked - just not as badly. To teach me a lesson, you can
> >> even throw my car into the new A/SP-B/SP class.........
> >>
> >> BTW, I love Elans and RX-7 TTs, but by removing them a whole host
> >> of cars are at proximate parity: 911s, Corvettes, 240Zs, Vipers, etc.
> >> To add one more element, let the turbo cars run unlimited boost w/stock
> >> turbos in this class then see if the 300ZXTTs, Supra TTs, Porsche turbos,
> >> etc. can compete.
> >>
> >> Kent Rafferty
> >> E/SP Supra TT
> >
> >
> >
> >
|