autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SP Proposal

To: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop@ricochet.net>, "Kent Rafferty" <gs96@sgi.net>
Subject: Re: SP Proposal
From: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 1999 09:06:15 -0800
-----Original Message-----
From: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
To: Kent Rafferty <gs96@sgi.net>
Cc: autocross list <autox@autox.team.net>
Date: Friday, April 02, 1999 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: SP Proposal


>Do you mean that marques that do the sport best are not allowed to compete?
>Where do you "bump" them? Doesn't make sense to me.

   I think you mean, *de best AT the sport* don't you? ;-) As for doing the
sport good? Well...

sbw



>Kent Rafferty wrote:
>
>> After reading the new SPAC proposal, I'm still befuddled by some
>> of the classifications. For example, the M3 moves DOWN to Group
>> 6 from CSP while many seemingly slower cars can be found in
>> Groups I, II, and III.  How about a NON-TURBO Stealth in Group II --
>> any takers?
>>
>> OK, my kneejerk suggestion, which does not create another SP
>> class and may make for more interesting competition:  Bump the
>> RX-7 TT and Lotus Elan OUT of SP and combine A/SP and B/SP
>> and move all the "dregs" down to C, D and E  where they'll still
>> get smoked - just not as badly.   To teach me a lesson, you can
>> even throw my car into the new A/SP-B/SP class.........
>>
>> BTW, I love Elans and RX-7 TTs, but by removing them a whole host
>> of cars are at proximate parity:  911s, Corvettes, 240Zs, Vipers, etc.
>> To add one more element, let the turbo cars run unlimited boost w/stock
>> turbos in this class then see if the 300ZXTTs, Supra TTs, Porsche turbos,
>> etc. can compete.
>>
>> Kent Rafferty
>> E/SP Supra TT
>
>
>
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>