On Sun, 23 Mar 1997, Spitfire 1500 wrote:
> Odd Hedberg wrote:
> >
> > What You all have forgotten is the fact that the rear part of the
> > chassis frame is of a quite different layout, and much weaker on
> > the so called Mk1 chassis (the one used on the 948)...
>
> Oh No! =:-0 Andy Mace didn't say anything about that! Could it be
> that he was wrong... THREE TIMES! ;-)
Ron, y'all didn't ask! Besides, I can't be giving away all my secrets yet,
now can I? Most importantly, I just couldn't figure a good way to tie it
in with TRF and beer.
So, if anything, a sin of omission, not a sin of commission! :-)
--Andy
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Andrew Mace e-mail: amace@unix2.nysed.gov *
* *
* Mrs Irrelevant: Oh, is it a jet? *
* Man: Well, no... It's not so much of a jet, it's more your, er, *
* Triumph Herald engine with wings. *
* -- The Cut-price Airline Sketch, Monty Python's Flying Circus *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
|