| To: | 76214.2773@compuserve.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: TR6 suspension sag |
| From: | JoeSimcoe@aol.com |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Mar 1996 22:48:18 -0500 |
| Cc: | triumphs@autox.team.net |
Brian, Define SAG vs. negative camber. The original specs call for 2 to 3 (I believe ) negative camber which makes the wheels look like they are sagging. /----\ I have proper setting around here someplace if you are interested. JoeSimcoe (PS asked my chasis man about the negative camber - his comment, "the british just had to be different") |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Valve adj=rough engine?, Tony Robinson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Goodyear Red Bands [was Re: Triumph research ...], ArthurK101 |
| Previous by Thread: | TR6 suspension sag, Brian Lanoway |
| Next by Thread: | Re:TR6 suspension sag, Gary |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |