ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Three runs in Round 6?

To: Keith Hearn <khearn@Legato.COM>
Subject: Re: Three runs in Round 6?
From: Pat Kelly <lollipop@ricochet.net>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 16:14:53 -0700
You forgot to mention we did lose a half hour or so cleaning up an oil spill.
Wouldn't have made a difference, and glad we only had one.
--Pat Kelly

Keith Hearn wrote:

> In message <04a601bfca84$57c9ccc0$b023fea9@moutons.org>, "Jerry Mouton" 
>writes:
> > Well, folks, what was your impression of having only
> > 3 runs for Sunday's event?  I had fun, even with 3 runs, and
> > there seemed  to be a lot less stress and pressure on
> > people running the event.  258 and through pretty early.
> > But of course, not time for any fun runs -- just time to breathe.
> >
> > Maybe it's worth it for local events?  What do you all
> > think?
>
> Round 6 took about 8 hours from first car until it was finished (first
>   car was at 9:10am, I've read it was over at 5:15). If you multiply
>   that by 4/3, you get 10 2/3 hours. That would have taken it until
>   almost 8pm. There's no way 4 runs would have worked. I'm in full
>   agreement with having just 3 runs at the 'Stick & at Oakland. I
>   just wish I'd realised this before round 5. Oh well, that's history
>   abnd we've learned from it.
>
>   Keith Hearn
>   '99 Miata 10AE "Sexy Sadie" the Sapphire Shark
>   B-Stock
>   Milpitas, CA


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>