Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kumho\s+ECSTA\s+Supra\s+712\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kumho\s+ECSTA\s+Supra\s+712\s*$/: 20 ]

Total 20 documents matching your query.

1. Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: Paul Cezanne <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 07:23:13 -0400; Is anybody running the Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (http://www.tirerack.com/tires/kumho/ku_712.jsp) as a street tire? Opinions? It reads well on the tirerack web site along with having a great price. And w; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00607.html (7,680 bytes)
2. RE: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 08:18:53 -0500; Is anybody running the Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (http://www.tirerack.com/tires/kumho/ku_712.jsp) as a street tire? Opinions? It reads well on the tirerack web site along with having a great price. And w; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00611.html (8,702 bytes)
3. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Jason S." <solo2crx@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 09:30:31 CDT; Yep I am running a set (195/50-15) of them on my Del Sol. I got them a little over a week ago from Tirerack and have about 400 miles on them. Since I just have a little time on them the impressions a; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00617.html (9,197 bytes)
4. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: RacerFlash@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:32:45 EDT; <<< Is anybody running the Kumho ECSTA Supra 712>>> Paul, I just installed a set on my 94 RX7 R2, 245/45-16's. The tread look great and they are very good in the rain. The tires seems to be a bit noi; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00618.html (7,975 bytes)
5. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: Paul Cezanne <oblique@alum.mit.edu>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:31:36 -0400; The treadwear rating is what bothers me. It is in the high 200's or low 300's depending upon the speed rating. That seems awfully high for what TireRack calls an "Ultra High Performance" tire. Seem t; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00619.html (8,130 bytes)
6. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Jason S." <solo2crx@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 09:55:55 CDT; Wow that is funny I have found them to be much less noisy than the Dunlops I was on. What type of Dunlops were you on. I wonder if tire size has anything to do with the noise, you are running a much; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00623.html (8,879 bytes)
7. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 08:43:33 -0700; We just got a set for the Type R in a 225/40/16 size. They are definitely quieter than the Bridgestone Potenza RE010s that came stock on the car. I finally got to drive it, and they seem to work quit; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00627.html (10,435 bytes)
8. RE: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Linnhoff, Eric" <elinnhoff@smmc.saint-lukes.org>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:47:16 -0500; We just got a set for the Type R in a 225/40/16 size. They are definitely quieter than the Bridgestone Potenza RE010s that came stock on the car. == Do they stick better than the RE010s? Those are su; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00630.html (9,002 bytes)
9. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Ron Bauer" <ronbauer@aa.net>; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 09:21:05 -0700; No, they don't seem to stick as well, but they are close enough that I'm not concerned with it. They also seem to be very predictable. Ron; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00633.html (8,525 bytes)
10. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: RacerFlash@aol.com; Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 12:40:59 EDT; << Wow that is funny I have found them to be much less noisy than the Dunlops I was on. What type of Dunlops were you on. I wonder if tire size has anything to do with the noise, you are running a mu; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00641.html (8,588 bytes)
11. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: TeamZ3@aol.com; Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 08:03:27 EDT; While at the Peru Pro I went on up to the TireRack on Friday and had a set put on my Z3 coupe. I think they are a good value and have lot's of tread for deep water; that's all I want for a street tir; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00714.html (8,592 bytes)
12. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Neary" <mcneary@usa.com>; Date: Sun, 28 May 2000 21:14:12 -0400; Check out the Peru Pro results in STS. 2nd place, Eric Kriemelmeyer was running the 712s. Today he won STS and the Honda Street Showdown in Petersburg on the Kumhos as well. Mike Neary....what's it t; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00724.html (9,187 bytes)
13. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 02:27:07 -0500; == Were they shaved or full tread Kumhos? I still contend that running "street" tires is not going to be any cheaper (or easier) for the top dogs (I love any sort of "cheap" argument when racing is; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00733.html (8,995 bytes)
14. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Mike Neary" <mcneary@usa.com>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 13:10:04 -0400; Full tread. Mike Neary....what's it to ya? '97 Acura Integra GS-R, DSP http://www.qis.net/~zoomie http://www.autocrossers.org; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00760.html (9,302 bytes)
15. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Phillip S. Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 10:27:30 -0400; Eric, this just supports the argument that it is actually cheaper to buy race dedicated tires than to buy street tires, have them shaved and use them for dual purpose. I was surprised at an event in; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00762.html (10,066 bytes)
16. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: Jeff Lloyd <Jeff@cyberconceptz.com>; Date: 29 May 2000 10:38:49 -0700; Your right, actually Kumho reccomends the 711 for ultimate street tire performance, Tire rack does not carry these YET but they are a maginitude better in all aspects except wet traction over the 712; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00763.html (8,505 bytes)
17. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 15:47:43 -0700 (PDT); You sure about that? Last I checked, the paperwork specified Kumho V700's only... == __________________________________________________ Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites. http://invites.yahoo.; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00781.html (7,947 bytes)
18. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Eric H. Kriemelmeyer" <magilla@olg.com>; Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 14:14:04 -0400; I see the discussions about this tire and can only add a few items. I chose this tire to race on in STS for a couple of reasons. Initially, the price. Then, the contingency money. Then I got some and; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00832.html (10,140 bytes)
19. Re: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: Vince Bly <vbly@pop200.gsfc.nasa.gov>; Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 17:51:47 -0500; == I called Kuhmo and specifically asked them about contengency for the 712 in STS. They said yes. BTW. Last year, I tried several tires and determined that the Michelin Mxx3 was the best for STS, fo; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00850.html (8,787 bytes)
20. RE: Kumho ECSTA Supra 712 (score: 1): Author: "Moore, John" <jmoore@spyglass.com>; Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 17:29:40 -0500; One thing that I imagine should be taken into account about the tires in STS is what type of car they are going on. From what I have seen of Subaru's, they like to be driven a bit "loose" to be fast.; /html/autox/2000-05/msg00854.html (10,015 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1]