spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cylinder Heads - differences?

To: Joe Curry <Spitlist@gte.net>
Subject: Re: Cylinder Heads - differences?
From: Kevin Rhodes <krhodes1@maine.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 19:46:47 -0400
I seem to have confused everyone - apologies! I am talking about the 
exhaust manifold, NOT the cylinder head! Perhaps the confusion is because I 
mentioned going from a tubular header back to the OEM cast iron manifold. 
Big lump of cast iron, THREE places for the exhaust to enter, ONE for it to 
go out. Am simply wondering if Triumph ever made one that actually matches 
the FOUR ports in the head. The gaskets all seem to have four individual 
ports, leaving that center divider bit of the gasket flapping in a rather 
hot breeze. Nothing remotely tubular about the OEM exhaust manifold. :-) 
The exhaust passages are more or less square until they blend together into 
the outlet flange area. Or do I have some really screwball Stanpart 
replacement manifold - I swear the part number cast into it matches all the 
catalogs for a MKII (maybe newer too - at least until emissions era) 
exhaust manifold.

Kevin

At 15:38 05/14/2003 -0700, Joe Curry wrote:


>Kevin Rhodes wrote:
> >
> > OK, re-reading Joe Curry's post I see that I mis-read it so my post is
> > misleading. However, my question is valid still. Early Triumph exhaust
> > manifolds (not cylinder head) most assuredly have a combined center exhaust
> > opening for cylinders 2+3 - I can post a picture of mine if you like. There
> > is no center divider. It is from a MKII, and has Stanpart with the part
> > number cast right into it. So did Triumph ever make one with a divider? I'm
> > thinking no, as someone with a 79 (complete with cat + EGR, which mine does
> > not have fittings for) wrote to say that his is the same as mine as to the
> > openings.
> >
> > Kevin Rhodes
> >
>
>No, the exhaust ports on the head are all separate.  I just don't know
>if the spacing is the same as on later Heads and therefore would allow
>the exhaust headers to be interchangeable.  If I were required to guess,
>I'd guess NO!
>
>Looking at a photo in the John Thomason book, the center exhaust ports
>are definitely separated (page 14, photo 1.42)
>
>Joe

///  spitfires@autox.team.net mailing list
///  or try  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>