At 03:18 PM 10/5/1999 -0600, Todd Green wrote:
>>Also, should I not expect my overall scores to be similar from event to
>>event? I've seen courses where an overall score in the 90% range felt
like a
>
>Hey all. Just used GEEZ for the first weekend at an Idaho/Utah
>"divisional". Lots to type up, no time to do it :( Very briefly, I assume
>everyone is using raw unadjusted data|ratings for their display?
>Without doing so I had 99% ratings in everything but smoothness which
>was in the mid 90's. I know that I'm not that good of an autoxer ;)
>Using the raw data put me in the low to mid 90's, which is more in tune
>with the times I turned and how well I felt I drove.
My understanding is that GEEZ usage is based on the numbers YOU generate as
the high's under certain conditions and then makes sure you "keep" doing
this. So, if you are consistently "slow", the software assumes you are
staying at the limits and grades (on a curve) you "high" on usage.
You want a challenge, try a mod car where moving your hands and feet and
brain waves fast enough to stay at the car's limits is a real challenge
(not to say keeping a "soft stocker is easy either . . . I've done that too
and it is also hard). Hit a few corners well and you are a chump for others
where you couldn't keep up or didn't dare try for max cornering cause you
wouldn't (or at least didn't think you could) be able to slow in the 1 or 2
seconds available enough for the hard corner in the opposite direction!
Fun, as long as your ego can handle it! (and I'm only in a CM . . . can't
imagine what AM and BM are like!).
Dick Rasmussen
CM 85
85 Van Diemen RF-85 Formula Ford
|