i am interested, but i will be out of town on business that day.
my one travel condition to my new employer is that i dont travel on weekends
of events =)
id be available all day to help setup/run a one day practice event. i can
design courses and have chair/despot experience.
-james c
"True Street" forum http://thevenom.net/forum/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larry G. Word" <larry.word@printChannel.com>
Subject: RE: practice session
> Understood and I am not taking your input as being negative.
> These are thing that we all must know prior. I would be upset
> if you were not sharing this information to better educate myself
> and everyone else that is interested in the practice sessions.
>
> I think that John Kelly is "right on the money" with everyone who is
> interested in the idea of a practice session should all be at the next
> SRFSCCA meeting.
>
> Larry Word
> 666
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Kelly [mailto:lollipop487@attbi.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:06 AM
> To: larry.word@printChannel.com; john f. kelly jr.;
> ba-autox@autox.team.net; iagreen@ucdavis.edu; smokerbros@aol.com
> Subject: Re: practice session
>
>
> Okay, I get that part. And that is easy...as long as someone keeps track.
> And I guess there are enough incorporated clubs which can legally rent
> sites, pay insurance, get equipment, etc., etc.?
> I don't mean to be negative, I'm just asking questions.
> Sometimes when an 'older' person asks such questions, the 'younger' folks
> react like this old person is trying to say No, you can't do that. It's
sort
> of like you're reacting to your parent's opinions. That's not the case.
I'm
> just attempting to point out there is a lot of work to putting on events,
> even practice ones, before the event happens.
> If anyone is serious about practice events (and all events are practice in
a
> sense), remember it takes a higher level of commitment than showing up,
> changing tires, and running.
> --Pat Kelly
> ----------
> >From: "Larry G. Word" <larry.word@printChannel.com>
> >To: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@attbi.com>, "John F. Kelly Jr."
> <76067.1750@compuserve.com>, <ba-autox@autox.team.net>,
> <iagreen@ucdavis.edu>, <Smokerbros@aol.com>
> >Subject: RE: practice session
> >Date: Thu, Jan 31, 2002, 10:11 AM
> >
>
> >Easy as I can see it.
> >Have it so that once your on or join a team/club
> >that each driver can not change after the first event,
> >changes could not happen until the end of each season.
> >
> >Easy enough.
> >
> >Larry Word
> >666
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> >[mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of Pat Kelly
> >Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:31 AM
> >To: larry.word@printChannel.com; John F. Kelly Jr.;
> >ba-autox@autox.team.net; iagreen@ucdavis.edu; Smokerbros@aol.com
> >Subject: Re: practice session
> >
> >
> >Is this easy, as in easier said than done?
> >--Pat K
> >----------
> >>From: "Larry G. Word" <larry.word@printChannel.com>
> >>To: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>,
> ><ba-autox@autox.team.net>, <iagreen@ucdavis.edu>, <Smokerbros@aol.com>
> >>Subject: RE: practice session
> >>Date: Thu, Jan 31, 2002, 9:23 AM
> >>
> >
> >>That would seem easy to fix, what other issues were there?
> >>
> >>Larry Word
> >>666
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net
> >>[mailto:owner-ba-autox@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of John F. Kelly Jr.
> >>Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:52 AM
> >>To: ba-autox@autox.team.net; INTERNET:iagreen@ucdavis.edu;
> >>Smokerbros@aol.com
> >>Subject: Re: practice session
> >>
> >>
> >>-------------------- Begin Original Message --------------------
> >>
> >>Message text written by INTERNET:iagreen@ucdavis.edu
> >>
> >>"(People will
> >>generally pay more if they don't have to work, at least in L.A. region)
"
> >>
> >>-------------------- End Original Message --------------------
> >>
> >>This is the structure used by the no-longer-functioning (nor
autocrossing)
> >>clubs in the Northern California Sports Car Council.
> >>
> >>Each event was staged by a member club and their members staffed the
> event.
> >>Said were barred from competing in their events as they were the
"hosts."
> >>This led to some games playing as people switched club affiliations in
> >>order to score points in the NCSCC Championship. Some joined an
> >>NCSCC-affiliated club (You had to belong to one in order to score
points)
> >>that didn't stage autocrosses and they avoided working events entirely.
> And
> >>they won championships.
> >>
> >> Those clubs are, essentially, all gone.
> >>
> >> Maybe the reasons why that is the case will become clear to you
in
> >>the coming days?
> >>
> >>--John Kelly
|