autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National

To: 127dp@bellsouth.net, evolution-discussions@yahoogroups.com,
Subject: Re: [evolution-disc.] Statement from the Ft. Myers National
From: Ghsharp@aol.com
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:56:54 EST
Steve Hoelscher wrote:

Greg  Scharnberg wrote:
> How many Unprepared cars were entered in the  event?  You usually don't see 
> very many newbies at  Tours.
>

"Unprepared" refers to car classing.  As in street  prepared or prepared 
catagory vs. stock category.   In this  instance a car running in a stock 
category class is an "unprepared"  car.
 
I have to strongly disagree with that statement, Steve.  I don't  recall Stock
category cars being referred to as "unprepared cars" anywhere else in  the
rulebook, although I certainly could be mistaken.  We have  preparation rules
for Stock category cars, and people frequently refer to whether a Stock car  
is
"prepared" to the limit of the rules or not.
 
Surely "unprepared cars" in the context of this rule must refer to a daily  
driver
car with stock suspension and tires showing up at an event (presumably,  again
in the context of the rule, with a less experienced driver), not to a Stock  
class
car with the allowed suspension mods and R-compound tires?
 
Not trying to be the language police here, but this would seem to be  
extremely
important since it would appear that the PC's decision turned on the  meaning 
of
that word "unprepared".
 
GH




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>