In a message dated 6/9/2002 1:40:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
teamnet@hedlygoeke.com writes:
<<
Just because these car run similar times, doesn't mean they belong together.
They are different ducks, and you can draw the same conclusions with other
classes.
---JHG >>
we on the SAC when the s2000 came out told the seb that we recommend SS
and told them that it would destroy the current a-stock class that it
would
dominate. well there are no more national 968, m3, z3, 944s2, and one mr2
Left. If this is good for the sport then I need to reevaluate the people
who run it.
because in my mind the scca destroyed the best class they had. the class
had
many cars that could win but with the addition of the s2000 the better
drivers
chose to go to the overdog for the class that is why they became so popular.
i also believe that all the boxsters and s2000 should be together. the
boxster
should be together in a-stock as a best of breed, the boxster s is only an
option
package like the zo6. so why do we not put them together, i will tell you
why
the seb feels that the boxster s is too fast yet in the past 2 years the
"S" was
only . 2 ahead of the s2000 of Gary Thomason and . 1 ahead of Andy McKee
Boxster but . 6 behind the z06. So it belongs up in the higher class.
bull !!!
Rob Falkner
boxster S 2000 2nd and 2001 3rd
968 1999 4th
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
|