Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?'

To:	<SVPViper@aol.com>, <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject:	Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?'
From:	"Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date:	Sat, 20 Jan 2001 21:31:05 -0600

SVPViper@aol.com wrote:


>But when SM is designed to be
>quicker than SP... it makes NO sense to put more restrictions on
the cars!

Then we all agree that the more-restrictive-than-SP "street
legal" wording should be removed from the SM rules.

Glad you got it figured out.

Jay

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', (continued) Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Daniel Salive Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', dg50 Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Jay Mitchell Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', dg50 Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Kevin Stevens Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Kevin Stevens RE: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Michael McAvoy Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Jay Mitchell RE: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Mark J. Andy RE: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', SVPViper Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', Jay Mitchell <= Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', SVPViper

Previous by Date:	K&N Television spots was: Fram Deal, Murray, Matthew D.
Next by Date:	Re: Fram Deal, Paul Foster
Previous by Thread:	RE: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', SVPViper
Next by Thread:	Re: Fwd: Re: SM PAX & 'Street Legal?', SVPViper
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]