Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DQ\s+question\s*$/: 31 ]

Total 31 documents matching your query.

1. DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:40:00 -0700
Please give me some input without flames and let me know what you think? SCCA National T1 race, 3 cars entered. first car across finish is 1/2 lap ahead of second place car and 1 & 1/2 laps ahead of
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00868.html (8,654 bytes)

2. RE: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Miller, Don" <MillerD2@idhw.state.id.us>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 12:51:17 -0600
IMHO: under weight is under weight, that's is why there are minimums. Did you have a body piece that broke off to cause being under? 2nd, if the car is too wide that's the same situation. Rules are r
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00871.html (9,445 bytes)

3. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:59:02 -0700
My point exactly ;-) sbw varied other
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00872.html (10,596 bytes)

4. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: Randy Chase <randyc2@home.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 12:09:16 -0700
Regardless of driver and how many times it was weighed it was not legal. Kinda like the protest at nats about a car being a incorrect. Doesn't matter if it's one pound or 100 pounds. Unfortunate thou
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00873.html (9,118 bytes)

5. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 12:15:11 -0700
sbw varied 1/2
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00875.html (9,895 bytes)

6. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:16:38 -0400
I'm hardly a rules expert, particularly in this area, but it seems VERY strange that they'd be so strict as to DQ you because your car is probably (but not definitely - it's within the scale's margi
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00876.html (9,065 bytes)

7. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 14:19:34 -0500
<snip> == Hmm, shoulda left those McDonald's wrappers in the car after all. ;^) Next time remember to nonchalantly toss your hat back into the car also. I sure would've asked to see the scale calibr
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00877.html (9,472 bytes)

8. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:27:48 -0400 (EDT)
Is it normal to have such a lightly sbscribed class? Just curious... ... IMHO, the only grounds for a protest would be if you could show the scales were defective and you actually weighed 3200 or ab
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00878.html (10,980 bytes)

9. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 14:22:42 -0500
<snip> Interesting. I've got a friend who's an IT enduro racer. At a race earlier this year, his car, which had finished second, weighed in eight lbs. under the minimum, with the race-finishing drive
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00879.html (9,447 bytes)

10. RE: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Ellingson, George A (MED)" <George.Ellingson@amermsx.med.ge.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 14:42:45 -0500
<snip> My question would be what did YOU think it weighed when you started. If it was over the minimum, you should check the scales that you used. Next time, throw in an extra 10 lbs. (and maybe drop
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00881.html (8,631 bytes)

11. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 12:51:20 -0700
Everybody's a critic! Sheeesh ;-) sbw
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00882.html (9,128 bytes)

12. RE: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Blankenship <jblanken@itds.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:04:41 CDT
You know, I keep waiting to see where DQ comes into it. Obviously Dairy Queen affects driver weight, but if the car is weighed without driver, how is that supposed to help? Confused, and with very li
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00883.html (8,937 bytes)

13. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Robert M. Pickrell Jr." <brnrubr@midusa.net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 15:04:21 -0500
I do not know about being pissed. The winning car does not make much sense, but I do not know the rules that apply. As for the weights SCCA to my knowledge has always ruled that the sacles used at th
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00885.html (10,922 bytes)

14. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:23:16 -0700
No, I do understand and it is kinda simple but I wonder about the fact that the scales were not capable of repeating their weights ? sbw but has the mean weight think? varied Yep, for other 1/2
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00887.html (11,721 bytes)

15. RE: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: Paul Hagger <paulhag@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:29:06 -0700
If that's what you are wondering about, then consider wheel spacers as the same thing. When autocrossing, you need to get wheel spacers that are not EXACTLY .25" wide, but that are EXACTLY: .25" wid
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00888.html (8,736 bytes)

16. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:29:23 -0400
That's true, but unfortunately for you NONE of the weights the car registered were over 3200. :( Not trying to flame ya - just calling it like I see it. - Justin
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00889.html (8,439 bytes)

17. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: "Scotty *BOB* White" <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 13:34:07 -0700
sbw --Original Message-- From: Paul Hagger <paulhag@microsoft.com> To: 'Scotty *BOB* White' <we2fat4asp@seanet.com>; Robert M. Pickrell Jr. <brnrubr@midusa.net> Cc: autox@autox.team.net <autox@autox
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00890.html (9,224 bytes)

18. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:53:59 -0400
Is it true that at Nationals many years back a car had a cooler full of beer on ice bolted securely in the trunk for consumption in impound??? pZ -- Paul Czarnecki Please visit my website at http://
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00891.html (8,582 bytes)

19. Re: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 16:59:30 -0400
nope, doesn't matter. These are the official scales of the event open to all competitors during the weekend. This isn't a radar trap you are trying to beat... pZ -- Paul Czarnecki Please visit my web
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00893.html (9,156 bytes)

20. RE: DQ question (score: 1)
Author: Paul Czarnecki <oblique@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 17:00:33 -0400
Scotty? Why didn't you protest the F355 F1 car? pZ -- Paul Czarnecki Please visit my website at http://www.customline.com/ride99 and take a moment to help me do something to change the world.
/html/autox/1999-05/msg00895.html (8,673 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu