Mail Archive Search: <+from:msmith2@columbus.rr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:msmith2@columbus.rr.com: 166 ]

Total 166 documents matching your query.

21. Re: DOT Race Tires may become illegal (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 23:16:29 -0400; To me, that's like saying.... "QUICK!, let your lawmakers know that you don't appreciate this bill.. If it passes, Ferraris will go from $200K to $400K!!!!!" Mike /// unsubscribe/change address requ; /html/autox/2002-05/msg00386.html (10,113 bytes)
22. Re: Forwarded: Re: SS, AS, BS who cares (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 00:32:45 -0500; Umm, not only are the mildly older ones still competitive in FS, you still see LOTS of the '82-92 Camaros and Firebirds routinely in the top-10 or top-5. Mike /// unsubscribe/change address requests; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00482.html (7,614 bytes)
23. Re: New F Stock car? (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:51:43 -0500; Just keep in mind that the car weighs ~3400lbs in it's Australian form. Autoweek was estimating that it will weigh 3620lbs in Pontiac garb. I dunno, it sounds like a porker to me.... Mike /// unsubsc; /html/autox/2002-03/msg00499.html (7,596 bytes)
24. Re: [evolution-disc.] Re: SP rules (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 19:32:59 -0500; Granted, I'm an outsider to Stock, but why are some afraid of the "stock-appearing" shocks rule's enforcement, when Stock doesn't seem to have had trouble with a "stock-appearing" engine ruleset? I m; /html/autox/2002-01/msg00158.html (10,427 bytes)
25. Re: Like we need another class (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 20:50:32 -0500; It says in there, that STX will replace STR. The "too many classes" people can calm down now.... Mike /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordo; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00214.html (7,551 bytes)
26. Re: "P" rules (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 23:42:01 -0500; Since SCCA does things in order of listing what is permitted, and then saying that which isn't listed, is prohibited, it's not a matter of being half-legal, but being half-prepped. If there's somethi; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00226.html (9,272 bytes)
27. Re: Acceptable finish designs (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 22:35:40 -0500; As a previous timing and scoring guy, I can attest to the after effects of putting whoop-de-doos right before, or right after the timing lights... It usually means some light repair of the lights and; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00274.html (8,249 bytes)
28. Re: "P" rules (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 10:15:14 -0500; I think the both of ya are on opposite ends of the same stick... To me, the GCR statement in the SoloII rules only requires the minimum required equipment necessary for a GT-1 prepped car. Period. Th; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00290.html (12,664 bytes)
29. Re: "P" rules (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 21:55:24 -0500; Well, I can see why it might not be that cut and dried.... It doesn't make sense to allow GT-1 cars in Prepared with a weight penalty, but make K-member-equipped cars go to EM without at least the s; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00309.html (11,136 bytes)
30. Re: "P" rules (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 22:45:51 -0500; Oh, I know... How dare I suggest something like that.... <grin> Mike /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothin; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00315.html (8,147 bytes)
31. Re: "P" rules (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 20:22:35 -0500; I'm actually a Prod-based CP guy.... I just see some "unintended consequences" of the Prod/GT marriage in Prepared making a lot of Prod part of it obsolete. Ah, like Mark said.. No reason to open tha; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00368.html (8,220 bytes)
32. Re: Why most autocrossers don't want their sport on TV (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 23:10:18 -0500; I got a better compromise.... Put Pro Solo on TV, and leave Solo II alone.... Mike /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo; /html/autox/2001-12/msg00408.html (8,747 bytes)
33. Re: Jeep Liberty Rollover (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:10:03 -0500; It's all ABS's fault..... We all know that the default action taken by just about anyone who's gotten surprised by the errant car in front of them is to swerve and slam the brakes. (call it trail bra; /html/autox/2001-11/msg00262.html (8,564 bytes)
34. Re: Monocoque Wheels the lightest? (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2001 19:19:47 -0400; www.monocoquewheels.com Mike CP 58 /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe a; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00051.html (8,150 bytes)
35. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2001 22:18:34 -0400; Wow.. All this talk about "undersubscribed" Prepared classes.... Anyone remember what the largest class this year was? Anyone remember what the largest class LAST year was? That said, I do think ther; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00123.html (12,800 bytes)
36. RE: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2001 23:33:50 -0400; It don't make no difference if you're allowed a 1000cfm throttle body, if your cam lobes are smaller than teenage zits, and the head ports couldn't pass a good fart. I'm limited to a single 4-bbl car; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00169.html (11,950 bytes)
37. Re: Leaf blowers (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:29:33 -0400; Leaf blowers? I thought those were wheel chocks..... :-) Mike CP 58 /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00263.html (7,088 bytes)
38. Re: Proposal for SP cars to compete in P ??? (Rocky's History (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 00:33:23 -0400; I know why. Suppose some had advance knowledge that the cantilevers were going away, and that there was no rule forthcoming to allow the wider wheels.... You could "stock up" on the cantilevers while; /html/autox/2001-10/msg00264.html (10,004 bytes)
39. Re: WRX help please (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:06:12 -0400; The WRX (manual tranny) has a viscous center differential. That means that the power distribution is solely dependent on the traction at each end. If there is no wheel slippage, then the power distr; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00361.html (7,363 bytes)
40. RE: Armchair Racers (was WRX help) (score: 1): Author: Mike Smith <msmith2@columbus.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 21:30:24 -0400; It must be the water..... Mike /// autox@autox.team.net mailing list /// /// To unsubscribe send a plain text message to majordomo@autox.team.net /// with nothing in it but /// /// unsubscribe autox; /html/autox/2001-08/msg00414.html (8,683 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]