vintage-race
[Top] [All Lists]

Re[2]: TR6 Pistons & Rods

To: MHKitchen@aol.com, Jarl/Carol <deboer@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re[2]: TR6 Pistons & Rods
From: "Dunst, Mordecai" <mdunst@smtplink.Coh.ORG>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 97 18:06:06 pst
     
I could put in more than my two cents but, it seems that
we should go on...

So...

Are "vintage" and "racing" oxymoronic?  Similarly, if you wish to "race"
you must be competitive or can there be an entity described as
"Non-Competitive Racing"? or is this too an oxymoron?

All I want is to go fast(er), scare myself, make my endorphins tantalize my
vibratory senses, stimulate my vestibular system and hopefully not wet
my suit except for perspiration and never have contact.

Mordy 




______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: TR6 Pistons & Rods
Author:  Jarl/Carol <deboer@pacbell.net> at INTERNET
Date:    2/4/97 1:38 PM


MHKitchen@aol.com wrote:
> 
> Jarl;
> 
> You've made yourself very clear on your feelings regarding what many racers
> do today relative to utilizing modern technology vs. the way in was done back 
> then.  But, I don't understand how you can say using better rod materials
> result in an unfair performance advantage other than extended reliability.
>  We all know the costs of repairing and rebuilding vintage engines keep going 
> up.  Building them to last for maximum longevity makes sense for anyone with 
> a limited racing budget.
     
Myles, 
     
Spending an extra grand or so to unnecessarily replace con rods in 
search of "longevity"?  When the constraint is a "limited budget"? 
Accidentally gaining a "safe" 1-2000 RPM? Jim may do as he wishes, you 
can keep upgrading your Cortina regularly as often as you like, it still 
doesn't make your cars "vintage"  You may race them in vintage events, 
but just because they still look like what they were historically, they 
aren't vintage. Yes, in the past, when the cars were current, everyone 
pushed the edge of the performance and rules envelope. Colin Chapman was 
an excellent example. The point is that that was "real" (or 
then-current) racing. The rewards were prize money, trophies, improved 
sales of the cars, championships, the ego trip of winning, being the 
best. Our venue is different, at least I hope it is. Real racing is 
available to us, but I for one have given up that arena, and choose to 
compete in a sport where history, and what it meant, counts. I could 
play "what if" and upgrade my cars too, but if I did that, I'd go to 
SCCA or the like and measure myself and my car against competition that 
would truly assess my efforts.  Jarl
     
IMHO this is a dead horse on which we cannot reach a consensus. Can we 
go on?
     

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>