Quotes abbreviated:
>From: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com
> Someone else asked if I thought that 2 SM classes could replace 6 SP
> classes, and do so fairly. As it sits _right now_ - yes. ...if the SM rules
>are more attractive to the majority, then
> we'd expect that, over time, CSP, DSP, ESP, and FSP's raw material would
> gravitate over to the SM portions of the 2 combined classes and the "old
> skool' SP classes would attrit below the Nationals cutoff point and go
> away.
> ...It is absolutely essential that the performance of the married classes be
> equal to each other, and I agree 100% that it is too early to predict with
> any certainty which classes will wind up the performance counterparts of SM
> and SM2. My educated guess is that SM==BSP and SM2==ASP, but that
> definately remains to be seen.
BSP is MUCH faster than DSP, ESP, FSP, and yet you say CSP, DSP,
ESP, FSP would become SM. This appears to be contradictory. Did I
misinterpret something?
|