Uncle Jack is obviously trying for the unfair advantage again.
Fitz
"Jack W. Drews" wrote:
> Derek Harling wrote:
>
> > Gregory Nagy wrote:
> >
> > > I am sure the answer varies from organization to organization, but
>what
> > > constitutes a "vintage/historic" sports racing car?
>...........................
> >
> > Let me barge in with a first answer.
> >
> > The are two extremes -
> > 1 - on an absolute basis obviously it is NOT a vintage racer
> > 2 - on the other hand there are some organizations who would accept it.
> >
> > In between those extremes there are a thousand different alternative
>opinions
> > encompassing ALL organizations and, for that matter, individuals.
>
> Hmmm.....this could get to be an interesting discussion, if we apply the
>questions
> to individuals. Forget about the autenticity of the car -- I vote for a
>minimum age
> for drivers -- like maybe a driver must have been of legal driving age for
>the car
> he's racing during the year of its manufacture.......
>
> > You pays your
> > money . . . . . . .
> >
> > Of course you could also debate it ad nausium - and some people enjoy that
>. . .
> > . . . .
>
> --
>
> uncle jack
>
> The Attorney General advises that vintage racing may be injurious to your
>wealth.
|