In a message dated 20/01/98 01:44:08, you write:
<< Yes, I understood your post to indicate the same.
Sorry if I sounded to be disagreeing with your thinking. I was trying
to include you in my description of "us anal-retentive types" (as long
as that is not offensive).
>>
Judging by the general tone of your mailing, I feel you most probably do not
intend to offend, and If I knew what you really meant by 'anal-retentive' then
I would most probably not be offended, although it does 'seem' to be an
offensive term ?
(I just don't think it 'translates' between our two languages very well ?)
Leon
(no offence taken)
|