mg-mmm
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: another disput looming

To: mg-mmm@autox.team.net
Subject: Re: another disput looming
From: Kellmg@aol.com
Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 18:58:49 EST
Reply-to: Kellmg@aol.com
Sender: owner-mg-mmm@autox.team.net
Listers,

Being the guilty party who listed this originally. Pun intended.
I would have been more correct in the subject title to list it "Replica K3"
as opposed to "K3 Replica."
As for Pips remarks the "Our new Pre War MG Register Captain in Australia is
grappling with these terms" the UK Register has made this distinction many
years ago when they decided on the "Replica" as a prefix. So as not to be
confused with a 12/12 Rep. for instance. In this format it would read
"Replica 12/12 Replica."
The MMM Register register these replicas as "Replica K3."
Who was it that asked Mike Allison "Why are you trying to reinvent the
wheel"?

More to the point of the advert, and there have been no takers as yet.
Chassis Number. K0147?? Didn't any one tell them the Abingdon telephone
number??

Further, have you read Bob Clare's, the MMM Registrar's, comments in the
October MMM Bulletin? Page 15, last paragraph.

Brian Kelly.
PA 0512????


In a message dated 01/05/2002 5:13:03 PM Central Standard Time,
mgwizard@caloundra.net writes:



> My dear friends around the world.
>
> It was nice to see the pictures of the destroyed K1 and I thank you for the
> listing.  I am glad the PRESENT owner does not make it out to be a K3.  So
> many do.  And what about future owners.
>
> However, to call it a meticulous "upgrade to K3 specifications" is somewhat
> wide  of the mark.
>
> I enjoyed Mr C Sherriff's comments as he accurately describes this car as a
> FAKE.  That is, it is purporting to be something that it is not.
>
> Perhaps you would all consider if it is time that we gave these cars their
> correct name.  This car can only be a modified K1 or a K3 fake.  Surely it
> is
> not a replica.
>
> Our new Pre War MG Register Captain in Australia is grappling with these
> terms
> and it will be interesting to learn what he decides on these matters.
>
> I have said that I dislike the word "special" when describing MMM MG's.
 The
> reasons is that, to me, all MMM cars were special.  Some specially bad &
> some
> specially good, but nun the less, still special.  So when some one wants to
> change a car from this group, to something that it was not originally
> produced
> to be by making "it" look like something else, isn't it truly a FAKE.
>
> Well, today is Sunday and I guess it is time to leave you all to ponder
> those
> words
>
> Best wishes to all for 2002.
>
> Pip Bucknell
> AUSTRALIA

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Archives at http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/wilma/mg-mmm
///  Send list postings to mg-mmm@autox.team.net


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>