I read years ago that the designer(s) of the BMW 507 had something to do
with the roadster. Can anyone confirm this or provide more details?
Chris
>From: "Gordon Glasgow" <gsglasgow@attbi.com>
>Reply-To: "Gordon Glasgow" <gsglasgow@attbi.com>
>To: " roadster List" <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
>Subject: RE: Roadster styling (was originality thread)
>Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 17:38:53 -0800
>
>If you look at Hidehiro IIzuka's early stying sketches as reproduced in
>Phill
>Brook's (excellent) book, it appears that the tailights and relatively flat
>rear
>panel were part of the design from the very beginning. I think the
>taillights
>have a rather jet-exhaust look, which was quite common in that era.
>
>Of course, the panel isn't completely flat but rather has some interesting
>contours, which I'm sure has caused no end of grief to
>less-than-knowledgeable
>body men.
>
>By 1969 Triumph had picked up the flat rear panel idea in the
>Michelotti/Karmann
>designed TR6, which I always thought looked great. In fact, at one time I
>painted the rear panel on my roadster flat black like the Triumph (partly
>to
>hide corrosion).
>
>Gordon Glasgow
>Renton, WA
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
> > [mailto:owner-datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of snyler
> > Sent: Sunday, December 16, 2001 5:08 PM
> > To: Mark Sedlack; roadster List
> > Subject: Roadster styling (was originality thread)
> >
> >
> > Mark Sedlack wrote
> >
> > >However, I personally have never liked the "flat" rear-end panel on the
> > >Roadster, and have always suspected it was due primarily to ease of
> > >manufacture, rather than a planned styling detail.
> > I've wondered about the back recently myself. Perhaps it's a cost
>thing,
> > perhaps the roadster was ahead of its time, anticipating the Kamm-back
> > styling of the late 60s. I used to think the taillights were stuck
> > on...items pulled from the Nissan parts bin, but they're unique to the
> > roadster. If they'd used Bluebird (311) taillights of the era (which
> > look like they might fit) there'd be much more of an MGB resemblance.
>I
> > know the Roadster had its debut a year earlier, but it's hard enough to
> > convince folks of the order of appearance as it is.
> > -Marc T.
> >
> >
>==========================================================================
> > Marc Tyler TDROC Sisterdale TX
> > 1970 1600 #SPL311-31016
> > 1965 L-320 #L320 013642
> > http://datsun_marc.tripod.com/cgi-bin/datsun_homepage.html
> >
> > /// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
> > /// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
> > /// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> > /// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>
>/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
>/// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or go to
>/// http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
>/// Send list postings to datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
/// datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net mailing list
|