67.5 2000?? Them's fightin' words, pilgrim! And keep your hands off that
Solex, I've got my eye on you :-)
Paul
67 1600
-----Original Message-----
From: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us <Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us>
To: daymore@ozemail.com.au <daymore@ozemail.com.au>; michael e landskroner
<datsunmike@juno.com>
Cc: datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net <datsun-roadsters@autox.team.net>
Date: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 5:31 PM
Subject: Re[2]: '67 1600s
>Probably needs more clarification. Maybe their intent was a discussion of
>the 67.5 1600's, which have a body identical to the 67.5 2000's except for
>cosmetics (grille, chrome, shifter plate and badging).
>
>So, is that the case? Personally, I think the '66's and '67's are special.
>The dash treatment is sooo much nicer than the '67.5's. I know, the '67.5's
>have other features like visors and dual brake masters. But I really like
>the earlier dash treatment.
>
>Fred - So.SF
>'66 with 2L (so I'm a tiny little bit biased)
>'68 2000
>'68 1600
>'70 1600
>_________________________ Reply Separator ______________________________
>> Subject: Re: '67 1600s
>> Author: michael e landskroner <datsunmike@juno.com>
>> Date: 5/23/2000 7:11 PM
>>
>> While I don't mean to degrade any Roadster, I don't see what's so special
>> about a '67 as it is exactly like a '66, like mine for example.
>>
>> I've had 1819 for 20 years and it has under-gone 2 complete restos in
>> the 20 years. It has the original engine and tranny (not for long) but
>> numerous other parts were modified to make it more reliable for driving
>> eg: 240Z alternator, electric fan, more comfortable seats that don't
>> fly forward when you stop short and other improvements.
>>
>> My $.02
>
>
|