ba-autox
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: New Solo 2 Officers for 2005 and change to Street Tire

To: <mattydrance@yahoo.com>, "'Pat Kelly'" <lollipop487@comcast.net>,
Subject: RE: New Solo 2 Officers for 2005 and change to Street Tire
From: "Bryan Nemy" <bnemy@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 19:11:26 -0800
 How about the other scenario.  People decide that going to Nationals and
Tours is not a goal and stop running on race tires.  Switch to the ST class
and the race tire class is undersubscribed.

Bryan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ba-autox@Autox.Team.Net [mailto:owner-ba-autox@Autox.Team.Net]
On Behalf Of Matt Drance
Sent: Friday, December 17, 2004 6:58 PM
To: Pat Kelly; ba-autox@Autox.Team.Net
Subject: Re: New Solo 2 Officers for 2005 and change to Street Tire class

Hi Pat,

--- Pat Kelly <lollipop487@comcast.net> wrote:
>     However, running them with their base classes and compiling the 
> results later ends up not being fair to which ever class runs under 
> the worse conditions.

Excellent point, that's what I get for firing off an email without stopping
to think :-)

>     Two groups of Street Tire might be a good fit.
> What classes would run in
> each one?

Rex already suggested Stock and Everyone Else (STEE), which is kind of where
I was headed with it.  Maybe we could call it STFF (Fast and Furious).

Again, those were just two off-the-cuff ideas.  The point is, I think we
could dream up something other than The End Of Street Tire.  Like I said in
my first email, the individual ST "dunce" classes might be the opposite end
of the spectrum -- you win because you weren't racing against anybody.  That
cheapens the competition IMO.  If GS-ST ends up thin, I could try my luck in
GS, but as you get more serious the skill gap decreases a lot (I don't see
anybody winning GS in street tires).  So it becomes "if you want a
meaningful trophy, you need to spend another 1K a year".  I think that would
be unfortunate.  We have
(had) a mechanism in place for people with finite budgets to experience
large competition, and I think it would be a shame to lose that.






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>