I couldn't find Corvette, Camaro, or Mustang. Didn't read the fine print,
but it seems those should be listed!
--Pat K
----------
>From: Jake Hodges <jake@codeworm.com>
>To: <ba-autox@autox.team.net>
>Subject: Re: anyone have a 350Z yet?
>Date: Sat, Sep 21, 2002, 9:27 AM
>
> Well it only makes sense. The 360 Modena is 10 MORE than the 350Z, and 3
> and 6 are both more than 2. The S2000 only has a 2 and a bunch of zeros.
>
> See how none of this matters? Go drive the thing. It's ugly, but then
> again, so is every other car made. It looks fun on paper.. Judging by the
> Maxima that I just returned to Hertz with a nicked wheel and warped rotors,
> the engine should be a pure unadulterated joy. TORQUE! WOOO!! In fact, I
> would recommend looking at a Maxima if there was some aftermarket solution
> to it's woefully lame suspension. The car will make you do bad
> things. Get the "mad-pumpkin orange".
>
> (Interestingly, they didn't seem care when I told them about the rotors. I
> even said they got worse and worse while I was driving.)
>
> On a side note, I've been enjoying the Insurance Institute for Highway
> Safety's website. Go here, pick your car, and then find the link in the
> green sidebar that says, "Photos of vehicles with highest and lowest
> ratings in this class. It's scary that even though the fuel line was torn
> open and that the steering column moved up far enough that the drivers head
> bottomed out the airbag and was allowed to hit the steering wheel that the
> 2000-2002 Isuzu Trooper was NOT the worst midsize utility vehicle. Please,
> friends.. Don't buy SUVs.
>
> http://www.hwysafety.org/vehicle_ratings/ratings.htm
>
> Sadly, James, the 360Z isn't yet rated.
>
>
>>i have to admit you are probably right. the 360 modena is a much better
>>looking and performing car than the 350Z OR the S2000. now why was it i was
>>considering the 350 instead of the 360 in the first place? someone remind
>>me. :-)
>>
>>-james c
|