autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS?

To: Eric Linnhoff <knuckledragger@kcweb.net>,
Subject: Re: was Is A-stock soft? now BS?
From: David Hedderick <davebs14@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 13:37:49 -0700 (PDT)
Nope. Mine is an evil SOB to launch. At the pro if I
launched it too soft the car would bog, if I slipped
the %$@! out of the clutch it would launch decently,
and if I dropped it at 6k (which I ended up doing) it
would launch ok. My miata can get better 60ft times
than our Boxster can.  :-)  I had to switch to an S2k
for about 6 runs at the same pro. I just dropped the
clutch at about 7500 I believe and shifted as soon as
I hit 8900 (I sucked on the rest of the course but the
launches were decent).  :-) 

David


--- Eric Linnhoff <knuckledragger@kcweb.net> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> > You have to remember the S2000 is a lot
> > cheaper to buy and own, easier to align and
> change, a good pro car (the
> > Boxster sucks...),
>
=======================================================
> Really?  I would've thought the rear engine
> arrangement of the Boxster would
> lend itself well to the Pro format as it does with
> the MR2s.
> 
> Eric Linnhoff in KC
> '98 Dodge Neon R/T (see-dan)
> #69 STS
> www.geocities.com/eric10mm/KnuckleDragger
> 
> ///  unsubscribe/change address requests to
> majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
> ///  http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool
> ///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
> ///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive
> ///  Send list postings to autox@autox.team.net
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

///  unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net  or try
///  http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
///  Partial archives at http://www.team.net/archive


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>