autox
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Letter to SEB / ESP

To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Subject: Re: Letter to SEB / ESP
From: "Phillip Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2000 08:05:14 -0400
Yeah, and no one won a National Championship in a Supra, just came close, so
it was moved....

Phil O..
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Green" <talon95@kscable.com>
To: <autox@autox.team.net>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 6:40 AM
Subject: Re: Letter to SEB / ESP


> Well, let's assume for a minute that the M3 is classed properly.
> The question that comes to my mind then is, what was the basis
> for moving the Supra to BSP?  Just working from memory,
> I don't recall it being any more dominant than the M3.  If we're
> working from the modern pony car definition, the Supra fits
> it better than the M3.  Heavy, high HP sports car with 4
> seats (well, kinda 4 seats).
>
> I'm not saying the Supra should come back or the M3 should
> be moved, but it would be nice to understand the basis for
> each of these decisions.
>
> Dave G.
>
> > OK, Mr. Strano, Lets look at past results:
> > In 1997... John Ames won ESP by 1.149 seconds in a 96 Camaro SS
> >      Maybe the Camaro SS should have been moved to ASP or BSP!
> > In 1999... Mark Madarash won ESP by 1.206 sec. in a 88 Trans-Am
> >      Maybe the Trans Am should have been moved to ASP or BSP!
> > In 2000... Bob Tunnell wins ESP by 1.066 sec. in a 95 M3
> >      Should the M3 Be moved to ASP or BSP???
> >
> > You wanted to look at results!
> > Maybe we need one class for just Mustangs, one class for just Camaros,
and
> > one class for just M3s.
> >
> > And if your remarks about local events and local drivers was ment to
> > undermind my experience... I guess a 2nd place National Championship
> Trophy
> > means nothing!
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> >
> >
_________________________________________________________________________
> >
> >
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>