6pack
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Lightening the Flywheel

To: "'Don Malling'" <dmallin@attglobal.net>
Subject: RE: Lightening the Flywheel
From: "McMaster, John" <JOHN.MCMASTER@act.gov.au>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:48:39 +1000
Don,

Based on my experience - 18 at the "absolute" lowest but 19 seems to be
optimum and I think that's been confirmed by some of the other listers.  

All the best,

John Mc
'71 TR6 PI
'76 Dolomite 1850
'76 Dolomite Sprint
"Fast is First"

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Malling [mailto:dmallin@attglobal.net]
Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2003 1:40 
To: McMaster, John
Cc: Triumph List (E-mail 2)
Subject: Re: Lightening the Flywheel


Hi John, 

What's slightly heavier? What weight? Your 19# or more? TR250.

Don Malling

"McMaster, John" wrote:
> 
> My TR6 has a steel, cross-drilled long nose crank.  I've had all rotating
> parts balanced individually (rather than as a rotating mass) with the
crank
> nitrided and mico-polished.  I run a machined standard (cast) Flywheel
> weighing a bit less than 19 lbs with (new) standard flywheel bolts and red
> loctite.  This engine (with other modifications) revs to 7000 plus without
> any problems.  I'd suggest however, that 14lbs is way too light for the
cast
> flywheel - it may be OK for the track but no way for the street.....  It'd
> be a dog to get off the line!  With very little inertial mass you'd need
to
> slip the clutch at every take-off.  Not much fun in stop start daily
traffic
> and a pain in the butt to replace the clutch plate when it wears out
> prematurely!  I'd suggest a slightly "heavier" unit and watch that tacho
> spin...
> 
> John Mc
> '71 TR6 PI
> '76 Dolomite 1850
> '76 Dolomite Sprint
> "Fast is First"

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>