Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*velocity\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*velocity\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: velocity (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 10:31:29 -0400; I think the escape clause there is "not normally." The phrase earlier in the book is "contemplated." Makes you wonder of the staff is burning incense while they're doing the annual revisions.... :) J; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00686.html (7,348 bytes)
2. Re: velocity (score: 1): Author: Bradley Lamont <lamont@mailhost.org>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 09:58:56 -0500; Howard actually addressed the wording at the SEB meeting last Monday. When the original wording was developed about 10 years ago, the SCCA risk management team (ie the lawyers) cautioned against putt; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00689.html (7,520 bytes)
3. Re: velocity (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 16:59:07 -0400; The next sentence (2.1.A, page 49) says "The fastest portions of the course shall be those most remote from spectators and property." I was in grid space 45 on the A grid on the South -- the first sp; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00725.html (7,802 bytes)
4. RE: velocity (score: 1): Author: "Moore, John" <jmoore@opentv.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 17:02:21 -0500; I was rather surprised at this as well. Most times when I was walking the course leading up to there, I kept thinking about what would happen if someone lost thier brakes going into that corner. At 6; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00729.html (9,995 bytes)
5. Re: velocity (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:38:08 -0400; But with very limited distribution of the course map and no prior hot laps (that I've heard of) prior to the event, how do you know where and how fast the fastest portions are? Sometimes picking them; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00735.html (8,326 bytes)
6. Re: velocity (score: 1): Author: Loren Williams <Loren@kscable.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:54:44 -0500; I would be amazed to hear that either of the two Nationals courses were not pre-driven by SOMEONE at some point in time. Chances are, no one was thinking about speed at the time, they are generally m; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00742.html (7,606 bytes)
7. Re: velocity (score: 1): Author: Mari L Clements <mrndr2@juno.com>; Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 23:13:48 -0400; On Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:38:08 -0400 "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com> In this particular case, I doubt it. That section of the course looked wickedly fast from the map, and drove as expected. It was,; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00766.html (7,597 bytes)
8. Re: velocity (score: 1): Author: "Andy Whittle" <awhittle@fastrans.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 06:51:57 -0500; It would be relatively simple to put a maximum cone spacing on a four or more cone slalom and a maximum radius on turns that is more than say 60 degrees. The long slalom on the south course was about; /html/autox/2000-09/msg00779.html (7,389 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]