Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Should\s+Integra\s+Type\s+R\'s\s+be\s+in\s+Stock\s+Category\?\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 16:08:15 EST
I just found out today from Acura that there will be no 1999 Integra Type R's imported. Now we have approximately 13-1400 produced, and potentially the dominant car in G/S. Should the SEB/SCAC remove
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00229.html (7,814 bytes)

2. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 13:16:35 -0800 (PST)
The letter of the law says 1000, I guess. Bump 'em maybe, but they are series produced stock cars... amongst
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00232.html (8,102 bytes)

3. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Malzahn" <tmalzahn@tnmnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 15:30:37 -0600
They may return for the 2000 model year. The only reason Honda is not importing any for 1999 is because of a model switch-over and there is not enough time for the dealers to sell them. I think they
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00235.html (9,029 bytes)

4. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 13:29:42 -0800
Please don't talk amongst yourselves...there are PLENTY of cars that are allowed specifically by the SEB that have been produced in less quantity than the Type R. You trying to create a groundswell h
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00236.html (8,739 bytes)

5. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 14:39:37 -0700
I agree with Craig, bump 'em. They more accurately fit the profile of an E-Stock car anyway. -Josh2 -- Joshua Hadler '74 914 2.0 CSP/Bi - Hooligan Racing #29 - CONIVOR '87 Quantum Syncro - aka stealt
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00237.html (9,158 bytes)

6. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: "Tim Malzahn" <tmalzahn@tnmnetworks.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 15:52:57 -0600
Josh - I think you just gave all of the folks in ES a heart attack. Moving the Type R to ES is not a good idea. As far as I can tell, ES has smaller cars with moderate power (less than 140hp?). Note
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00239.html (8,990 bytes)

7. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 15:58:48 -0600
the == I'd say they're closer to DS than ES. Sheesh, and I drive a Neon no less. Oh well, I would welcome the new blood in what basically is a "spec" class wihtout actually being worded as one. ;^)
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00240.html (9,989 bytes)

8. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Joshua Hadler <jhadler@rmi.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 15:20:02 -0700
Well a little cardiac exercise is a good thing eh? ;-) Yes, smaller cars with more torque and less weight than the Type R. The Type R has a paltry 129 lb-ft of torque all the way up at a dizzying 730
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00242.html (10,076 bytes)

9. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Lloyd.Wilson@Alcan.Com
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 1999 16:30:09 -0500 (EST)
--Boundary_(ID_oZwfnDG5oSErmdq2cygufQ) Hey Josh, Are you trying to stir the pot or what. Drop the subject, you will not convince anyone and especially E-Stock that the Type-R should/would/could belon
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00246.html (8,662 bytes)

10. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Goeke" <joe_goeke@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 15:09:45 -0800
Its a great car, and they seem somewhat available, so why not allow them to run in stock as long as they are appropriately classed. The issue of staying in stock with such a low volume would only be
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00250.html (10,121 bytes)

11. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 20:41:07 -0500
According to memory (don't have a '99 book yet, and gave away my other one), the letter of the law is 1000 annually for cars *not classified by the SEB.* Which the Type R is. Jamie '92 Prelude Si (no
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00264.html (9,457 bytes)

12. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 22:32:01 EST
<< Please don't talk amongst yourselves...there are PLENTY of cars that are allowed specifically by the SEB that have been produced in less quantity than the Type R. You trying to create a groundswel
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00277.html (9,869 bytes)

13. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Craig Blome <cblome@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 1999 22:41:37 -0800 (PST)
Uh, "shouldn't" by what metric, Chuck? 1300 in 2 years? There were fewer than 1900 R package Miatas built in 4 years...should it be knocked out? What about 1LE's? Z07 Vettes? M030's especially? You g
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00287.html (9,648 bytes)

14. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@nassau.cv.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 08:14:16 -0500
Charlie, darling, let me repeat: One Thousand were made in 1998 (actually, it more by a few cars). Was there a part of the "One Thousand" you didn't understand? -- Matt Murray mailto:mattm@nassau.cv.
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00290.html (9,549 bytes)

15. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Annie Gill <baby_nsx@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 08:58:43 -0800 (PST)
Can't we all just get along? (or at least stop whining?) Honda/Acura decided a while back not to make any 99 R's, they aren't even making them for the Japan Domestic Market. This isn't really new inf
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00295.html (10,708 bytes)

16. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 18:33:09 EST
<< Uh, "shouldn't" by what metric, Chuck? 1300 in 2 years? There were fewer than 1900 R package Miatas built in 4 years...should it be knocked out? What about 1LE's? Z07 Vettes? M030's especially? Yo
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00297.html (9,929 bytes)

17. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Smokerbros@aol.com
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 18:33:16 EST
<< Charlie, darling, let me repeat: One Thousand were made in 1998 (actually, it was more by a few cars). Was there a part of the "One Thousand" you didn't understand? >> 1000 is for cars not specifi
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00298.html (9,193 bytes)

18. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Matt Murray <mattm@nassau.cv.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 19:15:12 -0500
Charlie (still wearing his SCAC hat) opinined: The 1k and the Integra are "cyrstal clear" (to quote Jack Nicholson in "A Few Good Men") to me. Are you sure you are not a little fuzzy on it? I guess I
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00299.html (10,353 bytes)

19. Re: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Feb 1999 21:39:07 -0500
Come on now. Where does it end? Sooner or later we'd be stuck running the base model of every car in every class. I'd agree that you can't make a Type R out of a GSR without alot of work. Does that m
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00300.html (10,970 bytes)

20. RE: Should Integra Type R's be in Stock Category? (score: 1)
Author: "Kevin Stevens" <Kevin_Stevens@Bigfoot.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 18:51:30 -0800
getting And that classification can be changed by the SEB at any time up to August of this year, or between seasons anytime. That's correct. If you quit revving your engine so high, maybe the ringin
/html/autox/1999-02/msg00301.html (10,531 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu