Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Air\s+compressors\s+yet\s+again\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Air\s+compressors\s+yet\s+again\.\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: drew@pixar.com; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 09:37:35 -0800; Hi all, Home Depot is selling a Cambell Hausfeld portable air compressor which looks like a pretty good deal to me and I was wondering what other people thought. It's rated at 6.5 hp, has a 26 gal ta; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00079.html (7,976 bytes)
2. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: Brian Kelley <bkelley@ford.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 13:05:21 EST; That's exactly what you want to look at. BTW, you can't make 6.5 HP with 110 volts! I have a large Sears "portable". It is very heavy and bulky and I have a trouble lifting it. I'd much rather carry; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00080.html (7,956 bytes)
3. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: drew@pixar.com; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 10:13:32 -0800; I guess I should have mentioned that the compressor requires 220 volts. Drew -- Drew Rogge drew@pixar.com; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00081.html (8,597 bytes)
4. RE: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: Keith Kaplan <keithka@microsoft.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 10:38:59 -0800; I'll ring in... Nothing that runs on 220 is portable, IMHO, because there seems to be very little standardization on 220 outlet configurations. Wherever you take your compressor, you probably won't f; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00082.html (9,328 bytes)
5. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: "Jack L. Poller" <poller@chromatic.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 10:46:30 -0800; I'm not sure I understand... 1 HP = 746 Watts 1 Watt = 1 Amp * 1 V at 110v, 6.5HP = 44+ Amps Is there a reason (other than you'd have to have big wires) that you can't draw 44 amps on 110, and theref; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00083.html (8,262 bytes)
6. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: GGORMAN@dsava.com (Gorman, George); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 13:50 EST; Sure you can make 6.5 HP with 110 volts. 6.5hp x 746 watts/hp = 4849 watts 4849 watts/110v = 44 amps. Which means that you can't make 6.5 hp on a standard 15-20 amp 110v household circuit (without tr; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00084.html (8,555 bytes)
7. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: Brian Evans <brian@uunet.ca>; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 17:30:38 -0500; Your house probably draws 100 amps on 110 volts twice - doubled to give 220. There's no theoretical reason you can't get 50 amps, just practical reasons. Brian Evans Director, General Sales UUNET Ca; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00085.html (8,685 bytes)
8. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: jblair@exis.net (John T. Blair); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 18:31:30 -0500; Drew, I must agree with what everyone else has already said. The bigger the accumulator the better. I have a 5hp 30gal tank and wish it was bigger. I will bring up one point that I haven't seen addre; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00086.html (9,675 bytes)
9. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: drew@pixar.com; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 15:39:13 -0800; I guess there's a couple of more points I left out. It's an oil type and it's not direct drive. I've heard a couple of people say that they think that direct drive compressors have a higher freq. noi; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00087.html (10,572 bytes)
10. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: cak@dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev); Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 16:12:19 -0800; The oil-type compressors require somewhat higher maintenance (you have to remember to change the oil once in a while), are less buzzy when they run (a lot of people can't stand the sound of the oil-l; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00088.html (9,528 bytes)
11. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: "Michael Sloane" <msloane@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 1996 22:48:31 -0500; I cannot argue about the volume, but I would go for a little higher pressure if I was looking. I also am doubtful about the portability of such a machine - any kind of extension cord will reduce the; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00090.html (10,202 bytes)
12. Re[2]: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: "John Loftin" <john.loftin@ccmail.eo.ray.com>; Date: Wed, 20 Nov 96 16:50:47 EST; Amen, I couldn't have said it better myself! I'll ring in... Nothing that runs on 220 is portable, IMHO, because there seems to be very little standardization on 220 outlet configurations. Wherever y; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00091.html (10,029 bytes)
13. Re[2]: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: Bob Hamilton <hamilton@cast.navnet.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 16:06:58 -0400; Further to what I wrote previously and what Ray G. just posted, the Webster manual states that the compressor should run at 1000 RPM maximum. Knowing the RPM of your motor, you should be able to cal; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00097.html (10,328 bytes)
14. Re: Air compressors yet again. (score: 1): Author: sflatt@gislab.teale.ca.gov (Steve Flatt); Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 13:34:44 -0800; Here's some: Mechanical (pump & motor) noise: Build a portable insulated enclosure for it (let sufficent air *IN* tho) a la impact printer enclosures; Move it outside the space you're in Exhaust/eng; /html/shop-talk/1996-11/msg00100.html (8,382 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]