Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+vs\s+2000\s+$was\:\s+I\'m\s+sold\!$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*1600\s+vs\s+2000\s+$was\:\s+I\'m\s+sold\!$\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: "John F Sandhoff" <sandhoff@csus.edu>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 11:36:17 -0700; It was written: Including an engine that throws NLA timing chains thru the valve cover :-) Sorry, cheap shop.. Actually, I have both a 1600 and a 2000. I like them both. They each have their niches.; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00513.html (8,669 bytes)
2. FW: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: "Brian Hollands" <bholland@hayes.ds.adp.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:05:13 -0400; Since when did "legal" have anything to do with "safe". Thank God for the flat silver paint on my vent windows - don't know how many times I'd have been killed due to glare with out it. Brian Either; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00514.html (8,201 bytes)
3. Re: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: "Eric Frisbee" <efris@home.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 13:22:07 -0600; I, too have both the 2000 and 1600... and I prefer the 1600! After personally experiencing the timing chain problems of the 2000 TWICE, I'd take that stout little 1600 engine every time! Both are gre; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00516.html (9,759 bytes)
4. Re: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: "Richard Rudden" <sequoia12@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:28:40 -0700; Ouch John... I've had my 2000 for 31 years, 146,000 miles and the only reason it's down now is due to really poor machine work causing a valve seat to part company with the head... Maybe I've been lu; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00517.html (9,653 bytes)
5. Re[2]: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: Fred_Katz@ci.sf.ca.us; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 13:26:14 -0700; You are very lucky. I have also had my 2000 for 30 years, but had two chain failures (and a 5-speed failure). Once I left my 2000 at a shop to have new tires mounted. With explicit instructions not; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00520.html (10,995 bytes)
6. Re: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: "Richard Rudden" <sequoia12@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 16:18:50 -0700; Now THAT would drive me over the top! we're talkin "film at 11" mad!! Fred, I'm NOT saying the 1600 is a slouch, far from it, but the 2L was meant to be the high performance car of the two. And like; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00532.html (11,850 bytes)
7. Re: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: "Richard Rudden" <sequoia12@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 16:27:13 -0700; Now THAT would drive me over the top! we're talkin "film at 11" mad!! Fred, I'm NOT saying the 1600 is a slouch, far from it, but the 2L was meant to be the high performance car of the two. And like; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00533.html (11,842 bytes)
8. Re: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: CalSpeed@aol.com; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 21:12:22 EDT; John... whats there to flame? You were so PC. I agree with you... both Roadsters are wonderful. I get the same good feeling driving either. Calspeed; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00539.html (7,993 bytes)
9. RE: 1600 vs 2000 (was: I'm sold!) (score: 1): Author: "Gordon Glasgow" <gsglasgow@home.com>; Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:52:40 -0700; What are you, a contortionist??? Maybe I'm just getting old. ;-) Gordon Glasgow Renton, WA But then I also have a nice reliable fun 1.6L Miata as well... (NOTE: comsumations have been performed IN it; /html/datsun-roadsters/2001-04/msg00546.html (7,923 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]