Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+way\s+to\s+reduce\s+some\s+classes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*A\s+way\s+to\s+reduce\s+some\s+classes\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:34:47 -0400; DISCLAIMER: This is just a discussion item. There are no plans to implement this, and even if there was, it couldn't happen any earlier than about 2004. DO NOT PANIC! Now, the good stuff: I had an in; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00715.html (13,152 bytes)
2. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:06:34 -0500; to implement As if you're privy to such plans when and if they're made. What exactly is your official position with the SCCA again? current SP vehicles as driven competitors have new cars - Define"ne; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00718.html (10,362 bytes)
3. RE: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: knuckledragger@kcweb.net; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:15:03 -0500; What a load of crap. You've already gone miles down that road, and we've all been perfectly aware of that. Your notion of SM from the beginning has been _precisely_ to replace SP. == Geez Jay, get it; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00719.html (8,049 bytes)
4. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: brandon.fetch@ey.com; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:26:34 -0500; I'm going to waste some bandwidth here, and I apologize but......... I'm trying to figure out what Jay has personally against Dennis. Comments along the lines of 'medication needs adjusting again' an; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00720.html (9,483 bytes)
5. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:31:22 -0400; Gee Jay, who the hell pissed in your cornflakes today? I'd tend to agree - SP/SM is a good place where obsolete Stock class cars can get an extra lease on life without having to go all the way to Pr; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00723.html (10,123 bytes)
6. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:58:13 -0500; Dennis gets going again: No, let's look at Nats 2000 _entries_. And compare SP with Stock, Prepared, Mod, and SM. The demographics of a class involve more than just the winning car. Once again, SP ai; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00724.html (9,044 bytes)
7. RE: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Eric Salem" <eric@mail.brown911.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 17:05:24 -0500; If we didn't have Jay and Dennis and Roger and Paul what would we do for That said as ASP competitor planning on his first Nationals this year I think it's a pretty good idea. keep it up guys! e; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00726.html (8,223 bytes)
8. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:46:15 -0700; Am I reading this wrong or is Dennis saying he (or "they" or whoever) could come up with rules that would allow all possible cars to compete fairly in only 2 SP(SM) classes? Rick Brown FP 240Z (forme; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00727.html (8,532 bytes)
9. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 18:35:06 -0500; I don't think that's what is being proposed. Instead, the (currently two if you stretch the point quite a bit) SM "classes" would be combined with the SP classes they most closely resemble (in Dennis; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00729.html (9,661 bytes)
10. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:12:03 -0400; Go ahead. I assume you have a calculator? How about doing some work and bringing some facts to the discussion instead of just sniping from the sidelines? Hardly suprising when you consider that the; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00734.html (12,468 bytes)
11. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:03:36 -0500; Dennis continues: It's your idea, not mine. The unsupported assertions are also yours. Ergo, the burden of proof is yours. Make your case re the "failure" of SP. Define "success" and "failure," and b; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00735.html (12,201 bytes)
12. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Winchell" <Jeff@Winchell.Com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:11:01 -0700; Quotes abbreviated: BSP is MUCH faster than DSP, ESP, FSP, and yet you say CSP, DSP, ESP, FSP would become SM. This appears to be contradictory. Did I misinterpret something?; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00737.html (9,749 bytes)
13. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: dg50@daimlerchrysler.com; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:31:48 -0400; with SM Overlooked one thing - there's SM2 (potentially mixed with ASP) as a gravitation target as well. So the fast CSP cars (CRX, Miata) which are not eligible for SM could go to SM2 if it appeale; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00740.html (9,431 bytes)
14. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "gs96" <gs96@sgi.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:54:26 -0400; If certain SP classes are "failing" there is a mechanism (which I'd personally like to tweak) that deals with that. The whole concept of an SM/SP consolidation doesn't make sense to me regardless of; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00742.html (10,884 bytes)
15. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Mark J. Hirt" <nxracer@mediaone.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:20:48 -0500; So what you are proposing is we get rid of the classes were costs are already out of control and replace them with classes that will make the costs more out of control. The BSP Supra did beat the SM; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00746.html (9,215 bytes)
16. RE: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Howell, Brett (4149)" <brett.howell@esavio.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:41:11 -0400; (sarcasm alert) Yeah, good point. We wouldn't want to attract anyone wanting to drive an "old" car. If people can't afford to buy a new car and put 20 years worth of development into it before it get; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00749.html (11,368 bytes)
17. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Ayer, John K" <John.Ayer@PSS.Boeing.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:20:40 -0700; I agree with Jay(!) factually and philosophically, though not attitudinally this time. (He was the voice of total reason during PF's last round of goo, nobody's perfect:) There's NO need to involve S; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00750.html (9,668 bytes)
18. RE: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: knuckledragger@kcweb.net; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:34:23 -0500; I've got a beef with Dennis Grant. I begin with critical semantic clarifications. First, I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I h; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00751.html (10,502 bytes)
19. Re: A way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: "Rick Brown" <free2000@quixnet.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:46:50 -0700; Finally, a post on this subject that makes sense............. Rick (thumbing through his thesaurus/dictionary) Brown FP 240Z miss I from being is question, tell the more or say.; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00753.html (11,323 bytes)
20. RE:a way to reduce some classes (score: 1): Author: Keith Srakocic <Keith944T@excite.com>; Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 07:11:39 -0700 (PDT); I've only got a single layer, flame retardent cotton driving suit from my Solo 1 days, so I can't stay in the flame war too long... In my opinion, the ages of cars in their respective levels of prepa; /html/autox/2001-04/msg00774.html (8,971 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]