On Mon, 21 Jun 1999 Johntr6@aol.com wrote:
> I'm a long-time 6 owner who is presently looking at a 65 TR4. Needs work but
> not a total restore. Aside from the stylish Michelotti body, does anyone out
> there speak strongly for this model? Some call it a "transition", and there
> isn't much difference mechanically from the TR3's, is there? The 4 cylinder
> is nice and simple, but speed and acceleration don't measure up to previous
> and later models, according to what I've read. Can one squeeze more
> compression from the block? Can it be made into a lively little car? Any
> comments? John
No, not much difference mechanically- but that body makes quite a
difference. The spare tire is in the trunk, not in a cubby. The hood
(bonnet) is bigger, and lets you get at more of the engine. It's a few
inches wider than the TR3.
As for the TR6, probably quite similar; not too many parts are shared
however. The 4 cylinder has got about the same amount of oomph found in
the 6 in stock trim; you can get up to 150HP with the 4-banger but it will
probably go 'bang'.
My TR4 won't win many drag races, can't outhandle a Honda Civic
(regardless of the stickers on said Honda Civic)- but it's a blast to
drive, and I'm keeping it.
I may get a TR6 someday if the opportunity presents itself (One thing at a
time!!). Same applies for TR3. Might even get a Spit or a GT6. And a
Standard Atlas!! And a Stag! And a Herald!!!
*ahem* sorry.
-Malcolm
* There is a FAQ for this list! Its new home is:
http://www.islandnet.com/~walker05/triumph/trfaq.htm
|