triumphs
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Eastwood Corroless Vs POR15

To: <triumphs@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Eastwood Corroless Vs POR15
From: "Winnie Olmer" <who@sover.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:39:33 -0400charset="iso-8859-1"
Comments: SoVerNet Verification (on pike.sover.net)cscompaq from arc3a69.bf.sover.net [209.198.82.135] 209.198.82.135Mon, 14 Jun 1999 19:42:15 -0400 (EDT)
Importance: Normal
John... I'm looking for an answer to the same question. I have two cans of
Corroless sitting here next to a POR15 catalog I just got. If I did not have
the Corroless already... I would be getting the POR15. Seems like I see lots
of email mentioning POR15 and none mentioning the use of Corroless. Since
I've already made a purchase I'm willing to use the Corroless if I find out
it's pretty equivalent to POR15. If I discover that POR15 is substantially
better, I'll take the loss and get POR15 considering the amount of work it
takes to get to the a "stripped frame" stage. Any input would be
appreciated.

Thanks!
Winnie
'72 TR6

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-triumphs@autox.team.net
[mailto:owner-triumphs@autox.team.net]On Behalf Of John E. Allen
Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 10:57 AM
To: Triumphs List
Subject: Eastwood Corroless Vs POR15




Does anyone have any experience with Eastwood Corroless rust paint?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>