spitfires
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Spitfire Swing Spring

To: <ZoboHerald@aol.com>, <spitfires@autox.team.net>
Subject: RE: Spitfire Swing Spring
From: "Joe Curry" <spitlist@COX.NET>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 09:15:16 -0700
-----Original Message-----
From: spitfires-owner@autox.team.net
[mailto:spitfires-owner@autox.team.net] On Behalf Of ZoboHerald@aol.com
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 8:45 AM
To: spitfires@autox.team.net
Subject: RE: Spitfire Swing Spring

In a message dated 8/30/2004 10:45:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time, "Joe
Curry" <spitlist@COX.NET> writes:

>Richard,
>You are correct sir!  But (and there always is a but), if you lengthen
>the axles without changing the length of the spring the upright will
>change angles (to the ground not the axle).  This is because the spring
>is the upper control element and the axle is the lower control element
>in a swing axle setup.  When the axle length is increased, the angle of
>the upright must also change.  

=====

And let's not forget the angle (and, possibly, the length and/or shape,
although I've never measured same) of the radius arm. Of course,
apparently the longer axles also did NOT warrant a change to the rear
shock absorber.

--Andy Mace

Yes, lets not forget that.  They are different for the long axles.  So
anyone thinking about upgrading (if that is the correct term in this
case) to longer axles must also get the right radius arms.

Joe





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>