Yes, PCV is "Positive Crankcase Ventilation". Somewhere the engine has a
PCV valve. The PCV port goes to that valve, and the other end of that valve
goes to the crankcase. My experience is mostly with Buick/Olds 215 V8
rather than the Rover 3.5L. On the Buick/Olds it goes to one of the valve
covers. Perhaps someone else will know the location of the PCV on the Rover.
Probably the Buick-Rover-V8@autox.team.net list would be a good place to ask
this question.
Regards,
Jim B.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce" <brucemills@dccnet.com>
To: "bown" <bown@concentric.net>
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: Carb
> So the PVC stands for 'Positive Crankcase Ventilation? I am not sure where
> the PVC is on the Rover 3.5. At the back of the engine is a piece of pipe
> which goes into the cavity just above the lifters. I thoughts this would
be
> sufficient to vent the crank case. I have run a hose from this pipe to the
> charcoal canister. Am I on the right track?
>
> Bruce
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bown" <bown@concentric.net>
> To: "Bruce" <brucemills@dccnet.com>; "MGB Newsgroup"
> <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>; "Opstal, Lex van" <agopstal@huygmetaal.nl>
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 10:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Carb
>
>
> > Bruce,
> > Are you going to be using a PCV on your engine? If not: how do you plan
> on
> > venting the crankcase?
> > I would think that you do want to use a PCV and it would connect to the
> PCV
> > port.
> > A nice brass plug (with anti seize compound on the threads) should take
> care
> > of the brake servo hole on the manifold.
> > Jim B.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bruce" <brucemills@dccnet.com>
> > To: "MGB Newsgroup" <mgb-v8@autox.team.net>; "Opstal, Lex van"
> > <agopstal@huygmetaal.nl>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 9:42 PM
> > Subject: Re: Carb
> >
> >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Yes it makes sense. I am going to use the timed vacuum port on the
> > Edelbrock
> > > 1404 for the vacuum advance and the manifold vacuum port for the run
on
> > > control valve. I really don't know what the PCV port is for and I
don't
> > know
> > > what to do with the brake servo fitting in the intake manifold
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Opstal, Lex van" <agopstal@huygmetaal.nl>
> > > To: "'Bruce'" <brucemills@dccnet.com>
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 11:13 AM
> > > Subject: Carb
> > >
> > >
> > > > Bruce,
> > > >
> > > > If the original vacuum take-of was on the carb right after
> > > > the throttle you should not atke the vacuum of the intake-
> > > > manifold for in that case you will end up with fat too much
> > > > advance as the vacuum in the manifold is much, much higher
> > > > than after the throttledisc.
> > > >
> > > > Hope this helps.
> > > >
> > > > Lex van Opstal.
> > > > Holland.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > > Van: Bruce [mailto:brucemills@dccnet.com]
> > > > Verzonden: donderdag 18 januari 2001 4:30
> > > > Aan: MGB Newsgroup
> > > > Onderwerp: Carb
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > With regard to the Edelbrock intake 2198.
> > > > On the Rover 3.5 intake there is a threaded spot for the original
> Brake
> > > > Servo line. On the Edelbrock intake there is a corresponding spot. I
> > plan
> > > on
> > > > hooking up the distributor vacuum advance to the 'Timed' vacuum
> fitting
> > on
> > > > the carb and the run on control valve to the other vacuum fitting
on
> > the
> > > > carb. Should I just get a fitting and just blank off the brake servo
> > line.
> > > I
> > > > have a 1974 MGB with ordinary brakes. And what is/and what do I do
> with
> > > the
> > > > fitting for the PVC. I hope I have all this right. I don't have the
> > manual
> > > > handy.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Bruce
///
/// mgb-v8@autox.team.net mailing list
/// Send admin requests to majordomo@autox.team.net
/// Send list postings to mgb-v8@autox.team.net
/// Edit your replies! If they include this trailer, they will NOT be sent.
///
|