I, obviously, haven't been following this thread too closely. Can
anyone explain why the wear index should be so different for the TD?
Ted Jackson
51 TD #5554
Bud Krueger wrote:
> Road & Track used to publish figures for the 2500 ft/min engine speed.
> I'm looking at a June, 1961 copy of R&T where they reprinted their road
> tests on the TC, TD and TF (1250). Here's what they said:
>
> Rpm @2500 ft/min TC=4230 TD=4230 TF=4230
> equivalent MPH TC=65.6 TD=63.0 TF=66.2
> R&T Wear Index TC=88.2 TD=101 TF=87.0
>
> Bud Krueger
> 52TD
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-t
|