Bud,
Thanks for looking up their table.
Has anyone an idea why the wear index for TD was so much greater than
for TC and TF (101 vs 88.2, 87.0)? How was wear index calculated?
Bob
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 20:49:31 -0400 Bud Krueger <budkrueger@earthlink.net>
writes:
> Road & Track used to publish figures for the 2500 ft/min engine
> speed. I'm looking at a June, 1961 copy of R&T where they reprinted
their
> road tests on the TC, TD and TF (1250). Here's what they said:
>
> Rpm @2500 ft/min TC=4230 TD=4230 TF=4230
> equivalent MPH TC=65.6 TD=63.0 TF=66.2
> R&T Wear Index TC=88.2 TD=101 TF=87.0
>
> Bud Krueger
> 52TD
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-t
|