On Fri, 29 Aug 2003 07:48 -0400, Bob Howard wrote:
> Thanks for looking up their table.
> Has anyone an idea why the wear index for TD was so much greater than
> for TC and TF (101 vs 88.2, 87.0)? How was wear index calculated?
If i remember correctly, R&T's wear index was calculated using a formula
based on piston speed at 60 MPH (or some road speed). In any case, the TD
with standard axle ratio requires higher engine RPM to achieve any given
road speed than the TC and TF. In the case of the TC, the larger 19 inch
tires give lower revs per mile than the TD even though the axle ratio is
the same (5.125:1). In the case of the TF, the 4.875:1 axle ratio gives
lower revs per mile even though the tire size is the same.
--
Chip Old 1948 M.G. TC TC6710 XPAG7430 NEMGTR #2271
Cub Hill, Maryland 1962 Triumph TR4 CT3154LO CT3479E
fold@bcpl.net
/// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try
/// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo
/// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/mg-t
|